The Best (And Worst) State Obamacare Websites, the federal website that serves 36 states, is basically fixed, according to the Obama administration. Some might quibble — what about the back end, for instance — but it is undoubtedly performing much better than it was in October.

As for the 15 Obamacare websites being operated by states (including Washington, D.C.), their performances are currently all over the proverbial map. Kentucky is almost universally regarded as the best, as TPM has reported, but what about the rest?

It’s an inexact science, but a look at the enrollment data they’ve released as well as the headlines that they’ve attracted is a useful starting point. Here are three of the best and three of the worst performing state-run marketplaces.



If nothing else, California is buoying the nation’s Obamacare enrollment numbers. It outpaced the 36 states using all on its own in October and has picked up the pace with nearly 80,000 enrollees as of Nov. 19. One navigator told the Fresno Bee two weeks ago that he’d give the site a “B-“, but that’s a ringing endorsement in the context of’s struggles and some of its state counterparts.


Connecticut was singled out alongside New York by Families USA, a national pro-Obamacare group, as one of the best state marketplaces in the country. Its enrollment numbers seem respectable (11,000 as of mid-November) and, maybe more importantly, state officials say it is the only marketplace that has enrolled more people in private insurance than Medicaid. State officials are so confident in their abilities that they’re reportedly considering building the capability to verify data on their own so they don’t have to rely on the federal data hub.


Its enrollment continues to rank among the highest in the country, and the president himself called Gov. Steve Beshear (D) to congratulate him on such a successful rollout. Read the whole story here.



The president’s home state is notable for being the first marketplace to have its director leave after poor performance. Consumers were not able to access the site until the middle of October, and problems have persisted since. Its enrollment number for the month of October? From last month’s HHS report: “N/A.” It had a contract with the same software contractor that has weathered much of the blame for’s problems.


The site’s performance has been so bad that the state is still relying on paper applications to get people enrolled, and as a result, nobody had been confirmed as enrolled until Monday. That was the same day that its executive director requested a leave of absence while the board considered his job performance.


Washington’s enrollment figures appear respectable (third-most in October and officials said it would exceed that figure in November), but it’s committed one of the most egregious errors. State officials discovered at the end of October that 8,000 people had received the wrong information about the size of the tax credits that they would receive under the law.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Dc
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: