Republicans Dealt A Quiet Blow To O-Care In The CRomnibus

House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio smiles as he and other GOP leaders talk about an accord on the payroll tax cut negotiations as they meet with reporters at the Capitol in Washington, Wednesdsy, Feb. 15, 2012. (AP P... House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio smiles as he and other GOP leaders talk about an accord on the payroll tax cut negotiations as they meet with reporters at the Capitol in Washington, Wednesdsy, Feb. 15, 2012. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The government funding bill colloquially called the CRomnibus that the House passed on Thursday night included a GOP-proposed change to an Obamacare program long loathed by Republicans.

A House aide confirmed to TPM that Republican staffers requested the change to the so-called risk corridor program, which is designed to keep premiums stable by making payments to insurers if they lose more money than expected in the law’s first few years.

Some health policy wonks picked up on the language, but it received negligible attention compared to the campaign finance and Dodd-Frank provisions that nearly derailed the spending bill in the House on Thursday night.

The way the risk corridor program works: Insurers estimate in advance how their insurance pools will look and if in the end they’re significantly better than estimated, they pay money into the program; if they’re significantly worse than estimated, they are paid money by the program.

The CRomnibus, which funds most of the government through the next year, prohibits the Health and Human Services Department from transferring funds from other sources to fund the program. The practical impact, one policy expert told TPM, is that HHS can therefore only use money brought into the program to make payouts, effectively making it revenue neutral.

“As far as anyone can tell, that’s what’s going on,” Timothy Jost, a health law professor at Washington and Lee University who is supportive of the law, told TPM. In theory, if the program doesn’t bring in enough money to make its payouts, that could mean insurers will have to — at the very least — wait a year before getting their money. In turn, that could have a negative impact on 2016 premiums if insurers have to take a loss in the meantime.

“I think it’s important, but I don’t think it’s the end of the world,” Jost said, explaining that major insurers should have the bandwidth to absorb any adverse effects. But smaller insurers might be relying on the risk corridor program, along with the law’s reinsurance and risk adjustment programs that are also designed to keep prices stable in the law’s early years, to remain solvent.

But any negative effects on insurance companies — and then, by extension, Obamacare — are a policy win for Republicans, who have derided risk corridors as a taxpayer-funded bailouts. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) proposed a bill last year to repeal the program entirely.

America’s Health Insurance Plans, the industry’s lobbying group, told TPM that they were aware of the change and had concerns about it. An official statement alluded to the potential negative effects on premiums.

“American budgets are already strained by health care costs, and this change will lead to higher premiums for consumers and make it more difficult to achieve affordability,” Clare Krusing, an AHIP spokesperson, said. “Our focus should be on changes to the law that will lower costs — like repealing the health insurance tax — not those that drive premiums higher.”

The Senate is expected to take up the CRomnibus, which is supported by the White House and Senate Democratic leadership, on Friday or Monday. The White House didn’t immediately respond to TPM’s request for comment about the risk corridor provision.

Notable Replies

  1. Curious to see what else has been snuck into the Cromnibus. Evil geniuses finally figured out how to make Obama own any shutdown if the bill is vetoed.

  2. Avatar for pine pine says:

    Hate to say it but I think the President got played like a bass drum on this one.

  3. Nah. He’s been giving in to both Republican requests and Republican demands since day one.

  4. “But smaller insurers might be relying on the risk corridor program”

    In other words, it’s an attack on small business and more support for the plutocrat ruling class at their expense…and another missed opportunity by the Dems to fucking message something like that.

  5. Elections have consequences, regardless how few people choose to vote in them. I’m really not interested in coming to this site to join disaffected progressives crying in their beer over every GOP legislative victory during Obama’s lame duck term. The fault is not in our stars, it is in ourselves. Time to move on and rebuild.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

215 more replies

Participants

Avatar for doremus_jessup Avatar for slbinva Avatar for anniew Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for jw1 Avatar for marby Avatar for brooklyndweller Avatar for UnfadingGreen Avatar for leftflank Avatar for enon Avatar for boston11 Avatar for randyabraham Avatar for sniffit Avatar for chuck_voellinger Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for sherlock1 Avatar for theghostofeustacetilley Avatar for justamarine Avatar for haggie Avatar for darrtown Avatar for occamsrazor2 Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for emilianoelmexicano Avatar for 62fender

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: