Obama Gears Up For His First Veto Of The Republican Congress

President Barack Obama delivers his State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress on Capitol Hill on Tuesday, Jan. 20, 2015, in Washington, as House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, listens in the backgroun... President Barack Obama delivers his State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress on Capitol Hill on Tuesday, Jan. 20, 2015, in Washington, as House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, listens in the background. (AP Photo/Mandel Ngan, Pool) MORE LESS

President Barack Obama is poised to veto his first bill of the Republican-controlled Congress this week, as the House plans to take up the Senate-passed bill to force construction of the Keystone XL pipeline.

So far, Obama has vetoed a mere two bills, the lowest of any president since James Garfield in 1881, who held the office for just six months. One was a mundane veto of a duplicative spending bill; the other involved the notarization of mortgages.

A House vote on the Keystone bill is currently expected Wednesday. If it passes, it will go straight to Obama’s desk.

The White House has said Obama would veto the bill, complaining that it conflicts with executive branch procedures for considering whether such projects are in the national interest.

The veto, should it materialize, may be a sign of things to come. For the first time, Obama faces a Congress in which Republicans control both chambers. But Senate Democrats, who blocked votes on dozens of House-passed bills while they ran the chamber, may still protect Obama to an extent. They have demonstrated a willingness to mount aggressive filibusters, and Republicans need at least six Democrats to pass controversial bills.

4
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. " …it conflicts with executive branch procedures for considering whether such projects are in the national interest."

    Lord, I hope they’re not stupid enough to frame it that way. For fuck’s sake, put it in terms that the low-information voters will understand. Keystone would create fewer than 50 full-time jobs. It wouldn’t bring a single drop of gasoline or heating oil to U.S. customers. If it spilled, it would pollute the supply of fresh water for drinking and for agriculture for a large chunk of the upper Midwest.

    This is not complicated.

  2. I would think that comes later, after the final environmental review by the State Department, when, I hope President Obama decides against it. This episode is a separation of powers thingy and it might be better to treat it entirely that way at this point.

  3. You know that and I know that. But most voters will think that Obama is vetoing a “jobs bill.” The G.O.P. lies, and gets away with it.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for misterneutron

Continue Discussion