GOP Climate Change Skeptic Becomes A True Believer After Sandy

Rep. Michael Grimm, R-N.Y., speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill, Thursday, April 7, 2011, in Washington. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

In a rare move, a sitting Republican congressman is publicly accepting the scientific consensus of man-made climate change, breaking with the vast majority of his party to join the vast majority of climate scientists.

Rep. Michael Grimm (R-NY) reveals his change of heart in an interview with MSNBC anchor Chris Hayes airing Sunday on the Showtime documentary series “Years Of Living Dangerously,” the transcript of which was provided in advance to TPM.

“[T]he mass majority of respected scientists say that it’s conclusive, the evidence is clear. So I don’t think the jury is out,” Grimm says.

The congressman has served in the House since 2011, representing a swing district that includes parts of Brooklyn and Staten Island, which was hit hard by Superstorm Sandy.

“I mean there’s no question that, um, you know, the oceans have risen, right? And the climate change part is, is a real part of it,” the congressman says. “The problem that we’re gonna have right now — there’s no oxygen left in the room in Washington for another big debate, that’s the reality.”

The stance directly contradicts Grimm’s position in 2010, during the Republican primary, when he said he’s “skeptical” of climate change science and that the “jury is obviously out on it.”

“I have been one of the guys who have been skeptical of global warming from the beginning. The jury is obviously still out on it,” Grimm said at the time. “We see nothing but conflicting reports from scientists across the globe. I’m not sure, I’m not a scientist.”

In the “Years Of Living Dangerously” interview, Grimm doubted that Americans would act to combat climate change, saying the issue is “much bigger than me. I don’t think that humans in America, Americans, have the will to do it.”

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. I suppose Bill Maher can remove one congressman from “flip a district”.

  2. So a single event is all he needed? It somehow comes across as a change of “convenience”… There is more to this… I’d like to know the “behind the scene” repercussions…

  3. Looks like someone read his poll numbers.

  4. Typical GOP : something is a liberal hoax; a socialist nightmare; destroying America. Until something affects them. Only then is it is a real problem that needs addressing.

  5. I suspect the “event” that changed his position was some internal polling of his district which found that his prior position was a loser there.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

23 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for alphadad Avatar for webcelt Avatar for jmundstuk Avatar for atheis4 Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for rich_in_nj Avatar for bigpoppajumbo Avatar for leftflank Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for freeportguy2 Avatar for Barcolounger Avatar for mcbain Avatar for bwthemoose Avatar for patrick_hasburgh Avatar for benjoya Avatar for John_Boner Avatar for seedoubleyou Avatar for darrtown Avatar for nelsonrobison Avatar for wrs

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: