Many Judiciary GOPers Forgo Having Prosecutor Question Kavanaugh

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 27:  Senate Judiciary Committee members (L-R) Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and Chairman Charles Grassley listens to testimony from Christine Blasey Ford in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill September 27, 2018 in Washington, DC. A professor at Palo Alto University and a research psychologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine, Ford has accused Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her during a party in 1982 when they were high school students in suburban Maryland.  (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 27: Senate Judiciary Committee members (L-R) Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and Chairman Charles Grassley listens to testimony from Christine ... WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 27: Senate Judiciary Committee members (L-R) Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and Chairman Charles Grassley listens to testimony from Christine Blasey Ford in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill September 27, 2018 in Washington, DC. A professor at Palo Alto University and a research psychologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine, Ford has accused Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her during a party in 1982 when they were high school students in suburban Maryland. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

It appears that at least some Senate Judiciary Republicans were more interested in having a professional prosecutor question the woman accusing someone of sexual assault than the accused.

Rachel Mitchell, a Maricopa County attorney specializing in sex crimes, handled all of the Republicans’ questions for Christine Blasey Ford, who’s accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault.

As Kavanaugh’s turn to testify in front of the committee rolled on, nearly half of the Republicans on the Judiciary Committee decided to question him themselves —or at least, to praise Kavanaugh, bash Democrats and condemn the “circus” that they thought the hearing was. Those members were Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), John Cornyn (R-TX), Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT), and Sen. Mike Crapo (R-ID. At the beginning of the Kavanaugh portion of the hearing, Grassley deferred his time to let Mitchell question Kavanaugh. It’s unclear just yet which other Judiciary Republicans had also given up their time to Mitchell, if any, for her initial round of questions.

Graham, in an impassioned rant, said that Kavanaugh had faced “the most unethical sham I’ve ever seen in politics.”

Hatch defended Kavanaugh’s character and suggested the judge’s conduct in high school was not particularly relevant.

“This man is not a monster, nor is he what has been represented here in these hearings. We’re talking here today about Judge Kavanaugh’s conduct in high school,” Hatch said, using a tone of incredulity.

In her one turn of questioning Kavanaugh, Mitchell used the same smooth, meticulous tone as she used with Blasey Ford. Her questions were diligent — she went into detail about how she was defining sexual assault and questioned him about his drinking habits — but not unexpected. Nonetheless, he appeared annoyed her questions.

Kavanaugh seemed much more at ease when GOP senators took back over the questioning.

 

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for trnc trnc says:

    Republicans appear shocked at the idea of an investigation years after alleged crimes. Someone should ask if Denny Hastert should not have been investigated for his child molestation.

  2. She obviously wasn’t yelling enough. Trump was getting antsy and wanted to see some action!

  3. Avatar for reggid reggid says:

    Kavanaugh has been evasive, non-responsive, and sarcastic in his answers — even to questions from the GOP side. Which is why all the right-wingers are desperately peddling the narrative of his “forceful tone” and his “fight” — because on substance, they have nothing.

  4. I notice that Republicans don’t question any fact that their nominee is guilty of sexual assault, and lying about everything in his history.

    They only bitch about the timeline, that it’s last-minute.

    Who gives a shit if it’s last-minute if it’s true?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

77 more replies

Participants

Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for sysprog Avatar for matthew1961 Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for theod Avatar for sandyh Avatar for sniffit Avatar for psudawnc Avatar for arrendis Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for tecmage Avatar for quin Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for denisj Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for dddinah Avatar for darrtown Avatar for reggid Avatar for susanintheoc Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for proudbluegirl72 Avatar for tindalos Avatar for c_stedman

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: