Kobach And Kansas Dems Now In New Standoff In Senate Drama

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach listens to arguments before the Kansas Supreme Court in a petition by Democrat Chad Taylor to remove his name from the ballot after he withdrew from the U.S. Senate race Tuesday,... Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach listens to arguments before the Kansas Supreme Court in a petition by Democrat Chad Taylor to remove his name from the ballot after he withdrew from the U.S. Senate race Tuesday, Sept. 16, 2014, in Topeka, Kan. Kobach, a Republican, ruled that Taylor's name must remain on the ballot because he didn't comply with state election law. (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach (R) isn’t backing down after the state Supreme Court blocked him from keeping Democratic Senate nominee Chad Taylor on the November ballot. He is now demanding that the Democratic Party select a new candidate, arguing that state law requires it.

What Kansas Democrats are actually going to do, though, remains unclear. If, as is widely believed, Taylor’s withdrawal was a ploy by the party to funnel Democratic voters to independent candidate Greg Orman and unseat long-time incumbent Republican Sen. Pat Roberts, naming a new nominee doesn’t make much sense. But Kobach seems intent on forcing the issue.

A spokesperson for Kobach confirmed to TPM that he believed state law required the party to fill the vacancy. He said he would consider suing the Democratic Party to compel them to name a replacement if they didn’t do it on their own.

A Thursday statement on the court ruling from Kansas Democratic Party Chair Joan Wagnon didn’t address what Democrats would do next.

“I applaud the Kansas Supreme Court decision to follow the law and stop Kris Kobach from undermining Kansas democracy. Kris Kobach has proven he cannot be trusted to fairly enforce the law,” Wagnon said in the statement. “So long as Kris Kobach is Kansas Secretary of State, democracy is threatened.”

But earlier in the week, according to the Wichita Eagle, Wagnon said: “Until the court tells me to do something, I’m not going to do anything.”

The court explicitly said in its Thursday decision that it was not ruling on whether Democrats must replace Taylor.

A Kansas Democratic Party spokesperson did not immediately respond to TPM’s requests for comment. The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, which has maintained radio silence on the developments in Kansas, declined to comment.

Kobach is trying to put public pressure on Democrats to place somebody new on the ballot. He is delaying the shipment of absentee ballots to military voters from Sept. 20 to Sept. 27, he said Thursday, which would give Democrats time to find a replacement candidate.

“Eight days is more than enough time. If the Democratic Party wishes to play games with our election laws and not nominate a replacement, then I encourage the members of the press corps to ask them why,” Kobach said, according to the Eagle.

According to election law experts like the University of California-Irvine’s Rick Hasen, a lawsuit by Kobach might be his only hope of forcing the issue, though it is far from clear that he would prevail.

Amid all the jockeying, a registered Kansas Democrat jumped in to sue his own party to select a new Democratic nominee. David Orel of Kansas City, Kan., filed the suit just hours after the court ruling took Taylor’s name off the ballot. Orel had already filed an amicus brief in the first lawsuit, arguing that Taylor should be kept on the ballot.

As the Wichita Eagle reported earlier this week, Orel’s son Alexander is a campaign staffer for Republican Gov. Sam Brownback. Orel’s attorney, Thomas Haney, told TPM that Orel “has advised me he does not want to be interviewed regarding this.”

“Because (Orel), like many other Kansans, intends to vote for a Democratic candidate in November’s senatorial election,” Haney wrote in the new lawsuit, “any failure to provide such a candidate drastically undermines these individuals’ ‘portion of (the) sovereign power to vote.”

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. Surely there is a registered democrat somewhere in Kansas named Pat Roberts… Find him, put him on the ballot, and let Kobach deal with it.

  2. You don’t have to put a member of your own party on the ballot as your nominee. Declare Kris Kobach the Democratic candidate

  3. Someone in another thread says Dems should pic a candidate named “Roberts.” I love that idea.

  4. you can taste their fear

  5. The 13th Amendment says they don’t have to.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

154 more replies


Avatar for doremus_jessup Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for runfastandwin Avatar for jw1 Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for jep07 Avatar for jdkahler Avatar for trippin Avatar for mames5 Avatar for commiedearest Avatar for deminimis Avatar for fourlegsgood Avatar for gtomkins Avatar for tomdibble Avatar for DuckmanGR Avatar for sherlock1 Avatar for wargreymon2013 Avatar for harry_r_sohl Avatar for 538liberal Avatar for darrtown Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for jinnj Avatar for meta Avatar for tsp

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: