Dem Senators Disrupt Start Of Kavanaugh Hearing To Protest Last-Minute Document Dump

US Senator Dianne Feinstein, (D-CA), speaks with her Senate Judiciary Committee democratic members outside the US Supreme Court on September 4, 2018, before the hearing on the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to t... US Senator Dianne Feinstein, (D-CA), speaks with her Senate Judiciary Committee democratic members outside the US Supreme Court on September 4, 2018, before the hearing on the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the US Supreme Court. - President Donald Trump's newest Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh is expected to face punishing questioning from Democrats this week over his endorsement of presidential immunity and his opposition to abortion. Some two dozen witnesses are lined up to argue for and against confirming Kavanaugh, who could swing the nine-member high court decidedly in conservatives' favor for years to come. Democrats have mobilized heavily to prevent his approval. (Photo by Jim WATSON / AFP) (Photo credit should read JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) couldn’t begin his remarks at the start of the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation hearings without committee Democrats interrupting to complain about Republicans’ slow-walking of the documents related to his record.

“The question is, what is the administration afraid of showing the American people? What is it trying to hide?” Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) said.

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) was first to raise the issue of the roughly 40,000 pages of Kavanaugh documents that were released only Monday night. Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) jumped in also to complain about the issue.

“If we cannot be recognized, I move to adjourn,” Blumenthal (D-CT) said, prompting cheers from the public gathered in the back of the room.

Grassley tried, without much success, to get the hearing back on track.

You are out of order, I will proceed,” he said.

For every Senate Democrat who sought to interrupt, a demonstrator in the back of the hearing room also jumped up to protest Kavanaugh’s confirmation.

“You must vote no,” one protestor yelled, as she was escorted out of the room.

Grassley said he could address the Democrats’ concerns about the withheld documents, but doing so would not be “fair” to Judge Kavanaugh, who already was seated before the committee and ready to begin the hearings.

Grassley touted the hundreds of thousands of pages of Kavanuagh documents already released.

This is more pages than the last five Supreme Court nominees combined,” Grassley said.

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) brought up that the Supreme Court went a year without a ninth justice due to Senate Republicans’ blockade of President Obama’s nominee Merrick Garland.

“The fact that we cannot take a few days or weeks, to have a complete review of Judge Kavanaugh’s record is unfair to the American people,” he said.

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) argued that an court of law would delay a proceeding if one side dropped thousands of pages of documents on the other side the night before a hearing. This claim prompted Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) to gripe that, if this was a court hearing, the judge would have held Democrats in contempt for their interruptions.

Grassley said that even if the senators had trouble reading the 40,000 pages of documents released Monday, their staffs could have, as Grassley claimed that the GOP staff had read all of the documents recently released.

“That’s super human,” Whitehouse said, noting that would be 7,000 pages read per hour.

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. I :heart:Kamala Harris

  2. Not just a document dump at night, but on a holiday night. The level of dishonesty of the Republican Congress is beyond disgusting.

  3. Not a chance the Democrats can stop this, unless a few of the fake “reasonable Republicans” decide to join them. I can see two alternatives:

    • Slow things to a crawl; is there any way of throwing enough sand in the gears to keep the hearings going until the election?
    • Walk out and boycott the hearings altogether, considering that they’re a sham.

    It’s just embarrassing and sad seeing the Democrats unable to do anything about this fucking coup. Republicans boycotted Garland for a year, and now this travesty…

  4. That’s very cute lil’ davey, now go back to the kids table, the adults are having a conversation.

  5. Now you’re a mind reader?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

139 more replies

Participants

Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for jdkahler Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for bradbennett Avatar for impurescience Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for ottnott Avatar for nemo Avatar for alex_s Avatar for benthere Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for khyber900 Avatar for greysea Avatar for socalista Avatar for read2much Avatar for seamus42 Avatar for godwit Avatar for staggerlee

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: