Judge Wrestles With Who Should Get Sensitive Info In Russian Troll Case

FBI Director Robert Mueller listens as he testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, June 13, 2013, as the House Judiciary Committee held an oversight hearing on the FBI. Mueller is nearing the end of his 12 ... FBI Director Robert Mueller listens as he testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, June 13, 2013, as the House Judiciary Committee held an oversight hearing on the FBI. Mueller is nearing the end of his 12 years as head of the law enforcement agency that is conducting high-profile investigations of the Boston Marathon bombings, the attacks in Benghazi, Libya, and leaks of classified government information. The committee's chairman, Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., said when it comes to national security leaks, it's important to balance the need to protect secrecy with the need to let the news media do their job. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) MORE LESS
June 15, 2018 2:58 p.m.

A federal judge in Washington expressed concern Friday morning about giving a Russian company charged with conspiring to influence the 2016 presidential election via a social media troll campaign access to sensitive information about American citizens.

U.S. District Court Judge Dabney Friedrich ordered the company’s attorney and special counsel Robert Mueller’s team to craft an agreement within 10 days that will govern what data the defendants can see and what should be withheld out of fear it could be passed into the hands of hostile foreign agents, namely Russia intelligence.

“The government has presented good evidence for protecting some information from discovery, including sensitive but not classified information related to ongoing investigations and personal identifying information about victims of identity theft,” Friedrich said.

Mueller unveiled an indictment in February charging Concord Management and Consulting LLC with conspiring to defraud the United States. The corporation pleaded not guilty in early May. Since then, the two sides have been fighting over Concord’s ability to see the mountains of data the special counsel’s office has collected in the case, including information about the American citizens the Russian trolls are charged with impersonating, and targets of Mueller’s investigation who have not yet been charged. Concord Management is owned in part by Yevgeniy Prigozhin, a restaurant mogul with close ties to Vladimir Putin.

Mueller’s team has previously warned the court that Concord is attempting to use the case to gain access to sensitive information that could assist current and future Russian efforts to meddle in the U.S. democratic process.

“Public or unauthorized disclosure of this case’s discovery would result in the release of information that would assist foreign intelligence services, particularly those of the Russian Federation, and other foreign actors in future operations against the United States,” Mueller said, noting in particular the threat of exposing “uncharged individuals and entities that the government believes are continuing to engage in interference operations like those charged in the present indictment.”

Judge Friedrich lamented at the start of Friday’s hearing that “it’s unfortunate” the fight over discovery has dragged on so long, saying that she’s “disappointed” more progress has not yet been made and asking for a preliminary agreement by the end of the day.

“It’s a tough balance to strike here,” she added. “I would much rather you work out an agreement than I write one for you.”

As part of that agreement, Friedrich agreed with the prosecutor’s suggestion that a Justice Department attorney not affiliated with Mueller’s team be appointed as a “firewall counsel.” The firewall counsel would raise any objections the government might have to the company’s lawyers sharing the discovery with third parties as they prepare their case, without Mueller’s team being privy to the details. The judge also said the indicted company’s attorney must ask the court’s permission going forward to share the documents it does gain access to with any foreign national.

Concord’s lead attorney Eric Dubelier objected, saying, “If I can’t see the evidence, I don’t know who I need to share it with.”

Friedrich responded: “Once you see the evidence, you can come to the court and say, ‘I need to share it with this or that individual.'”

Dubelier conceded that a “firewall counsel” is appropriate, but suggested the process will quickly become untenable. “Do you want me coming in every day saying, ‘Can I show this? Can I show that?” Friedrich acknowledged that the court may need to hire a special master to handle that aspect of the case so it does not become a “full-time job” for her.

Though most of Friday centered on technical procedural questions, tensions between the two sides intermittently flared up.

“Clearly this is an unprecedented case, Your Honor, because the deputy solicitor general of the United States is down here at the courthouse with us common folk,” Dubelier sneered at one point, pointing to senior prosecutor Michael Dreeben.

Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Senior Editor:
Special Projects Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Senior Newswriter:
Editor at Large:
General Manager & General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Publishing Associate:
Front-End Developer:
Senior Designer: