Now Congress Gets A Whack At Obama’s Nuclear Deal With Iran

The Republican-controlled Congress can still kill President Obama’s Iran deal, but to do so, it faces an uphill battle.

Now that the historic deal, which would lift international sanctions in return for new limits on the Iranian nuclear program, has been announced, Congress has the ability to weigh in on it under the legislation signed by the president in May.

Under the process outlined by the legislation, Obama will report the details of the negotiation to Congress, upon which a 60-day clock will start ticking for Congress to act. It can vote to approve the deal, vote to disapprove it, or simply do nothing. If it votes against the deal, it would have the legal effect of maintaing U.S. sanctions on Iran, which would effectively kill the deal.

Republican opposition to the Iran deal has been fierce and nearly universal. But Obama said Tuesday that he would veto any bill that would block the Iran accord. So Republicans will need veto-proof majorities in each chamber if they want to kill the deal. Obama would have about 12 days to veto a hypothetical motion of disapproval, and Congress then would have 10 days to override the veto. A veto override, especially in the House, seems unlikely.

Republicans have already started to lash out at the deal, and even some key Democrats have expressed caution, such as Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY). However, previous efforts to undercut the deal, which has been years in the works, have fallen short of shoring up the two-thirds support required to overcome Obama’s veto. For instance, a bill to place new sanctions on Iran if negotiators blew past the June 30 deadline failed to advanced, despite having bipartisan support.

To build a veto-proof majority in the Senate, Republicans would need a dozen Democrats to join their ranks. Even more Democrats would need to join Republicans in the House. And that is assuming that all Republicans would come out against the deal. Some, such as Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN), chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, have stopped short of fully condemning Tuesday’s announcement.

“I want to read the agreement in detail and fully understand it, but I begin from a place of deep skepticism that the deal actually meets the goal of preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon,” Corker said in a statement.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Dc
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: