EXCLUSIVE: Here’s The House GOP’s ‘Incredibly Rigged’ Obamacare Survey

Speaker of the House John Boehner, R-Ohio, listens as he and GOP leaders meet reporters following a Republican strategy meeting on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, April 29, 2014. Boehner said Rep. Michael Grimm,... Speaker of the House John Boehner, R-Ohio, listens as he and GOP leaders meet reporters following a Republican strategy meeting on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, April 29, 2014. Boehner said Rep. Michael Grimm, R-N.Y., did the right thing by stepping down from the the House Financial Services Committee after he was indicted Monday with evading taxes. Grimm told Speaker Boehner he should be removed from the panel but said he plans to return once his legal issues are resolved. (AP Photo) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The survey that House Republicans used to conclude that only 67 percent of HealthCare.gov enrollees had paid their first premium appears designed to yield an unfavorable result — at least that’s the perception of one of the people whose company was asked to respond to it.

“The survey was so incredibly rigged to produce this result, it was a joke,” a source, whose company received it and who provided it to TPM, said. “Everyone who saw it knew exactly what the goal was.”

The survey included language that explicitly left out the fact some people would still have time to pay their premium after April 15, which is when the House Energy and Commerce Committee asked companies to return their answers.

The GOP survey simply asked companies for the number of enrollees who paid their first premium and the number who have not — but it did not account for the fact that some people in the latter group could still pay until at least April 30.

Nearly 40 percent of Obamacare enrollees signed up after March 15 — which means their first premium wasn’t due until after the committee finished collecting its data. The GOP’s 67 percent figure was therefore founded on bad math: It accounted for all enrollees, but it demanded figures be compiled more than two weeks before the actual deadline for many people to make their payments.

Republicans held the 67 percent finding up this week against the Obama administration’s victory lap when the law surpassed 8 million figures. TPM’s source concluded that the House survey was specifically designed to undermine the law’s recent run of good news.

“They were clearly trying to get a specific result to rebut any positive news about enrollment,” the source said. “If they were really trying to get full data, they would have waited until early May for the answers.”

A House Energy and Commerce Committee spokesperson confirmed that the survey provided to TPM was the same one used by the committee. A copy of the survey is below.

Energy and Commerce Data Collection Form

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. Gee where’s Darcy. Oh wait??? He doesn’t care about rigged Obamacare stories, he prefers to knock Obamacare

  2. I’m SHOCKED! Shocked that gambling is going on at this establishment!

  3. There they go…They’re putting their rake on the ground…They’re backing up…Now they’re walking forward again…

    THWACK!

  4. Dicks being dicks. Pretty Bush league, if you ask me. I expect pro-level dickishness from this krew.

  5. Just another marketing tactic for their base. The come up with a ‘number’, say it points to something bad, then the GOP is off to the races with the same meme they’ve had since before the law was even passed.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

53 more replies

Participants

Avatar for runfastandwin Avatar for butlerknights Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for deckbose Avatar for Mitch Avatar for ericaz Avatar for happyshadow Avatar for wiscojoe Avatar for commiedearest Avatar for thx1138 Avatar for UnEasyOne Avatar for trumpdog Avatar for sf_brian Avatar for lamonth Avatar for spocksblackpants Avatar for jimwolf359 Avatar for broken Avatar for denny Avatar for mocrash Avatar for darrtown Avatar for magicmaker Avatar for nerfherder Avatar for carguy Avatar for Libs

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: