Harry Reid Pushes Historic Filibuster Rules Change

This post has been updated.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) proposed the “nuclear option” to reform the filibuster on Thursday.

The move would scrap the filibuster for executive and judicial nominations, but not legislation or Supreme Court nominees, as Reid signaled earlier this week, and the sources confirmed. He has discussed the matter with his leadership team and members.

“I’m not talking about changing anything dealing with the Supreme Court or dealing with basic legislation,” he said Tuesday. “I am talking about executive nominations.”

Reid has grown fed-up with Republican obstruction and has growing support within his conference to nuke the minority blocking tactic. He needs 50 Democratic votes to bypass the two-thirds majority required under regular order for a rules change.

Multiple Democratic senators who have traditionally opposed filibuster reform — including Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Barbara Boxer (D-CA) — have recently come out for a rules change after the GOP’s mass blockade of President Barack Obama’s three nominees to the powerful D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, regardless of their qualifications.

Sen. Carl Levin (MI) is the only Democrat on record against invoking the nuclear option.

Reid is set to meet with advocates for filibuster reform Thursday afternoon in the Capitol.

“The obstruction we’ve seen in the last five years is nothing like we’ve ever seen before,” the majority leader told reporters on Tuesday. “This is not how democracy is supposed to work, or function, and the American people are sick of this.”

Don Stewart, a spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), said that if Democrats pull the nuclear trigger, “it will be a case of the pioneers of judicial filibusters breaking the rules to prevent — judicial filibusters.”

Watch Reid announce the proposed change on the Senate floor.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Dc
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: