Senate May Vote On Obamacare Repeal Without Knowing Cost Or Coverage Loss

Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., left, and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., second from right, accompanied by Sen. Dean Heller, R-Nev., second from left, and Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., right, fist bump each other during a news c... Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., left, and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., second from right, accompanied by Sen. Dean Heller, R-Nev., second from left, and Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., right, fist bump each other during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Sept. 13, 2017, to unveil legislation to reform health care. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik) MORE LESS

As Senate Republicans scramble to gather 50 votes on a bill that would repeal key pieces of the Affordable Care Act and convert Medicaid into a shrinking block grant controlled by the states, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office announced Monday that it will not be able to fully evaluate the bill’s impact on premiums, the uninsured or the federal budget in the next two weeks.

While promising a “preliminary assessment” of the Graham-Cassidy-Heller-Johnson legislation by early next week, the CBO noted that it does not have time to study how many people could lose their health insurance if the plan became law.

“CBO will provide as much qualitative information as possible about the effects of the legislation, however CBO will not be able to provide point estimates of the effects on the deficit, health insurance coverage, or premiums for at least several weeks,” according to the CBO statement.

Republicans do not have several weeks.

Their ability to pass the repeal bill with only 50 votes—thus avoiding a Democratic filibuster—expires at the end of September.

In a speech on the Senate floor on Monday, Senate Minority Leaders Chuck Schumer (D-NY) blasted his GOP colleagues for using the CBO merely to check a procedural box rather than to gather information about the impact their bill would have on millions of people.

“No CBO score, not a single hearing, everybody is totally in the dark about the effects of this bill,” Schumer complained. “This is legislative malpractice of the highest order.”

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Dc
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: