Conservative Groups Rail Against GOP’s ‘Obamacare-Lite’ Repeal Plan

House Budget Committee Chairman Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis. listens to testimony on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday Nov. 13, 2013, during a Congressional Budget Conference. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Conservative groups railed against the Obamacare repeal legislation released by House leadership this week, taking issue with the refundable tax credits the bill offers, as well as a continuous coverage requirement which critics likened to the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate.

A statement Tuesday from Jason Pye, director of public policy and legislative affairs at FreedomWorks, labeled the GOP bill “ObamaCare-lite.” Michael Needham, the CEO of Heritage Action, argued the legislation “not only accepts the flawed progressive premises of Obamacare but expands upon them.” The staff of the Republican Study Committee, which boasts 170 members in the House, said in a memo obtained by Bloomberg that the tax credits amounted to “a Republican welfare entitlement.”

Meanwhile, the House Freedom Caucus, a group of hardliners known to derail Republican agenda items, is planning its own press conference on the legislation later Tuesday afternoon. The House hardliners will be joined by Sens. Mike Lee (R-UT) and Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who has introduced his own Obamacare replacement legislation that has the backing of conservatives.

By lunch time, Americans For Prosperity, a group aligned with the Koch brothers’ network, had also come out against the legislation in a letter to Republican congressional leaders. The conservative Club for Growth issued a statement slamming the bill for its tax credit and Medicaid provisions.

“If this warmed-over substitute for government-run health care remains unchanged, the Club for Growth will key vote against it,” the group’s president David McIntosh said.

The House leadership’s bill, titled the American Health Care Act, can afford to lose less than two dozen GOP members in the House and two Republican senators. GOP leaders are also feeling pressure from the moderate wing, and particularly on how to handle the ACA’s Medicaid expansion, which will be allowed to continue unchanged through 2020 under the latest bill. That tweak further perturbed the caucus’ far-right wing. The Republican Study Committee memo, for instance, said that they had “major concerns” and that the bill would “continue to contribute to the worsening of the federal and state budgets by incentivizing states to maintain expansion or to initiate new expansions and leaving the federal government picking up the majority of the bill.”

“Rather than accept the flawed premises of Obamacare, congressional Republicans should fully repeal the failed law and begin a genuine effort to deliver on longstanding campaign promises that create a free market health care system that empowers patients and doctors,” Needham said in his statement.

Speaking to CNN Monday night, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), a former chair of the House Freedom Caucus who was critical of the leaked drafts of the bill, said that he was unimpressed with the newest version but that he was still had to discuss it with the rest of his caucus.

“My guess is this bill looks a lot like the last one, and we didn’t like the last one,” Jordan said.

    Latest DC

    Notable Replies

    1. Obamacare basically is the GOP health plan, so it isn’t surprising that anything they come up with looks similar to Obamacare

    2. Avatar for debg debg says:

      Only funded at a much lower level, with fewer benefits to people who actually NEED insurance.

    3. Aren’t those courageous Freedom Caucus members just flaming hypocrites for using a healthcare plan that is socialistically paid for by taxpayers? Aren’t they purer than the driven snow in their worship of all things private?

    4. Avatar for mrf mrf says:

      I’m sure the folks at Heritage, AFP etc. take the generous tax deduction for insuring their employees.

    5. This is why this will fail… Conservatives hate it, Dems won’t lift a finger to help, and the GOP is already having branding issues.

      The only way they’ll be able to sell an O-Care repeal is if they can sell it, honestly or not, as better than O-Care. The riotous town halls have already proven that their constituents care about this issue, and will not tolerate something that strips them of their healthcare. This is the fallout of the Republican base swelling with the white working poor who feel like the Dems left them behind. They can’t just cater to the rich any more because, wealthier, college educated whites are leaving their party. If they can’t sell to the average Trump voter why this is better for them than O-Care, then they’re going to be screwed, and nothing about this seems better for the average voter.

      Are they getting a tax cut? No. Are premiums going to magically drop? No. Is coverage going to expand? The Opposite.

      This is one of those bills that looks okay to them, on paper, as politicians and Federal Spending Hawks… but it’s going to be impossible to sell to the people who actually need healthcare.

      Oh, and their right flank thinks it’s not enough, and oppose it as well.

      Best of luck, assholes.

    Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

    82 more replies

    Participants

    Avatar for hickpop Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for fgs Avatar for rfscalf Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for jloomis3 Avatar for leftflank Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for becca656 Avatar for jjrothery Avatar for ottnott Avatar for lordmike Avatar for eb5 Avatar for quax Avatar for keninmn Avatar for jeffrey Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for darrtown Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for firewing2 Avatar for susanintheoc Avatar for greysea Avatar for coprophagoussmile

    Continue Discussion
    Masthead Masthead
    Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
    Executive Editor:
    Managing Editor:
    Associate Editor:
    Editor at Large:
    General Counsel:
    Publisher:
    Head of Product:
    Director of Technology:
    Associate Publisher:
    Front End Developer:
    Senior Designer: