Flake Explains Why He Sought A Delay In The Kavanaugh Confirmation Vote

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 28:  U.S. Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) speaks to members of the media after a meeting in the office of Senate Majority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) September 28, 2018 at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC. President Donald Trump has ordered a one-week-long supplemental FBI background investigation into sexual assault allegations made against Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh after Sen. Flake requested to delay the full Senate vote for the investigation.  (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) *** Local Caption *** Jeff Flake
WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 28: U.S. Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) speaks to members of the media after a meeting in the office of Senate Majority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) September 28, 2018 at the U.S. Capitol in... WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 28: U.S. Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) speaks to members of the media after a meeting in the office of Senate Majority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) September 28, 2018 at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC. President Donald Trump has ordered a one-week-long supplemental FBI background investigation into sexual assault allegations made against Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh after Sen. Flake requested to delay the full Senate vote for the investigation. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) wouldn’t say that a confrontation with a sexual assault survivor while he was in an elevator Friday morning played a role in his move, soon after, to successfully seek delay in the confirmation vote for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanugh, who’s been accused by three women of sexual misconduct.

Speaking to reporters after Senate leaders and the White House agreed to delay the floor vote for a week while the FBI investigated the allegations, Flake said he couldn’t “pinpoint” a single conversation that led him to make the request for a delay – which came after he had already issued a statement announcing his “yes” vote on Kavanaugh.

There  were interactions with a lot of people on the phone, email, text, walking around the Capitol, you name it,” Flake said. He said it was “remarkable” the “number of people” who saw the testimony Thursday of one of Kavanaugh’s accusers, Christine Blasey Ford,  and “were emboldened to come out and say what had happened to them.”

I heard from friends, close friends, and I had no idea,” Flake said. “I think that’s important, and people out there need to know that we’ve taken every measure that we can within reason to make sure this process is worthy of this institution.

Since Blasey Ford came out publicly with her allegations a week and a half ago, she and Democrats have called for the investigation Republicans have now, in a limited form, agreed to seek.

Flake stressed to reporters that, before the allegations came out, he was fully behind Kavanaugh’s confirmation, which would be no surprise to anyone who saw his beaming face at the first round of the judge’s confirmation hearings. He had also asked for the delay in the confirmation process last week so Blasey Ford could testify.

“I am a conservative, I would love to see Judge Kavanaugh confirmed and I hope to be able to do that,” Flake said, “But I want a better process and I think involving the FBI, reopening the background investigation that so many of my colleagues have been asking for and people across the country have been asking for, this can be done.”

The first inkling that Flake was going to throw a wrench in Republicans’ plans to confirm Kavanaugh by early next week came in a Judiciary Committee meeting where members were scheduled to vote the judge out of committee. Flake waved off his opportunity to make remarks ahead of the vote, and disappeared into a room connected to the hearing room with Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE). Other Judiciary Democrats shuffled in and out of the side room, as did Republican members of the committee.

What really I wanted to do, is to meet with some of my Democratic colleagues and say ‘What would cause you to say we have a better process. Not to say that you’ll vote for judge Kavanaugh,’” he said, later adding that, “Some of us on the Republican side will feel more comfortable moving to the final vote once the FBI has done a supplemental background check.”

After he announced his call for a delay on the floor vote, he and other Judiciary Republicans headed to Majority Leader Mitch McConnel’s office. They were joined by Sens. Susan Collins (R-ME) and Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), who backed the delay.

He played coy when a reporter asked him after the meeting how ticked off McConnell was.

“Everybody agreed that this was the way to move forward,” Flake said.

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. Apparently, they thought they could return to business as usual and be done with it. They were wrong.

  2. Flake didn’t completely punk out so that is good.

    And if we believe the women, as I believe we should, and if Kavanaugh remembers more than his putative alcohol-blackouts suggest then I would expect him to withdraw soon (requesting Benedict Donald cancel the FBI probe) rather than risk what a probe must inevitably reveal.

    PS: personally I not only want Kavanaugh’s nomination to fail but him disbarred and removed from his current court position but I’ll gladly settle for the first at this point.

  3. Where were those same Republican Senators who met with McConnell right after he decided that Merrick Garland didn’t deserve hearings for his nomination to the SCOTUS by President Obama? Was Obama not the President of the USA? Was he not legitimately elected? Did they think Merrick Garland (sitting on the same DC Court of Appeals where Kavanaugh is now) was outrageously unqualified? Or they just thought they could get away with it? Surely they didn’t know Trump and the Russians were going to somehow pull off a win in November 2016 - or did they?

  4. Congratulations Sen. Flake. Now that you’ve declared you’re leaving professional politics, you’re slowly reintegrating with both your conscience and your spine. I know the transition may be uncomfortable and unfamiliar, but we believe that it’s ultimately for the best.

  5. I guess he got blasted by women for going along with this…good on him for listening to them and saying that the process should stop until there is more investigation. It’s likely political posturing, the hope being that some more investigating will get people to quiet down after nothing else comes up (which may happen with only a week to do the work and possible interference), but it’s better than what they were trying to do. Now, we’ll have to see if anything does come out of the investigation, and if they talk to people generally and try to get some of the other anonymous reports on the record. Most important will be witness statements, if the FBI can get the people who are trying to cover for Kavanaugh to tell the truth about what happened, instead of cover for their buddy, it will be very good.

    As for Garland…it just comes down to the people not caring enough to rally and force the issue with Republicans. It was absolutely wrong what they did, but there was no groundswell to hold them accountable, no threat to their position, and it wasn’t even enough to drive people to the polls to make sure Clinton was elected and could put a judge on the Court. The difference is that now women are incensed, and they are even losing conservative women…they are in danger so they are trying to appease people to save their skins. It’s an object lesson in why participation and voting matters.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

84 more replies

Participants

Avatar for paulw Avatar for ajm Avatar for pol Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for bobatkinson Avatar for cervantes Avatar for vonq Avatar for damiana Avatar for irasdad Avatar for inversion Avatar for drriddle Avatar for clearwater Avatar for dickweed Avatar for gharlane Avatar for beattycat Avatar for noonm Avatar for spin Avatar for cub_calloway Avatar for kenstories Avatar for tindalos Avatar for seamus42 Avatar for skeptical Avatar for bcgister Avatar for dogmaalsocatma

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: