Dennis Hastert Charges Put His Handling Of Ex-Rep’s Sex Scandal In New Light

Former Rep. Mark Foley (left) and former House Speaker Dennis Hastert.

The criminal case that rocked former House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-IL) in recent days has cast a new, ugly pall over his handling of another ex-congressman’s sexual misconduct scandal almost a decade ago.

Hastert was indicted Thursday on charges of illegally withdrawing cash to avoid reporting requirements and lying to the FBI about those withdrawals. He’d allegedly taken out $1.7 million of $3.5 million total he’d agreed to pay towards a person identified in the indictment only as “Individual A,” a resident of Yorkville, Illinois, where Hastert taught and coached wrestling. The indictment said Hastert was compensating the person for “prior misconduct” that had occurred years earlier.

Later reports, based on anonymous federal law enforcement sources, said that “Individual A” was a male student and that alleged sexual abuse occurred while Hastert taught at Yorkville High School.

The dynamics at play in Hastert’s case are similar to those at work in the case of ex-Rep. Mark Foley (R-FL), who resigned from Congress in 2006 in a scandal over sexually explicit messages he sent high school-age, male interns. Hastert’s handling of the Foley affair itself was criticized as a cover-up, and it became a contributing factor to the GOP’s heavy midterm losses that fall.

Hastert originally maintained that he didn’t know about the explicit emails between Foley and members of the congressional page program until they were published in the news media, but a congressional ethics investigation later found the former House speaker knew much more than he let on.

Here’s how it all went down: ABC News published a series of emails and instant messages in late September 2006, prompting Foley’s resignation within 48 hours. In reaction, Hastert said the messages had been totally new information to House Republican Leadership when ABC News published them.

“The instant messages, reportedly between Congressman Foley and a former page sent in 2003, are vile and repulsive to me, and to my colleagues,” he said at the time. “No one in the Republican Leadership, nor Congressman Shimkus [who oversaw the page program], saw those messages until last Friday when ABC News released them to the public. When they were released, Congressman Foley resigned. And I’m glad he did, if he had not, I would have demanded his expulsion from the House of Representatives.”

Yet that conflicted with statements from Reps. John Boehner (R-OH) and Tom Reynolds (R-NY), who said they’d informed Hastert of Foley’s explicit messages in the spring of 2006. This New York Times interactive from the time showed the discrepancies in accounts of who knew what, and when. Hastert eventually took responsibility for the debacle, even if he didn’t admit prior knowledge of the allegations against Foley.

But a House Ethics Committee report released in December 2006 found that the “weight of the evidence” showed Hastert did know about explicit email messages Foley sent one page from Louisiana, while some of Hastert’s aides had known about Foley’s conduct around pages for years prior. The report determined that Hastert and other House Republicans did not violate any rules in their handling of the matter, however. Foley was not charged with a crime.

Still, Hastert’s handling of the Foley scandal dogged him. When Democrats seized control of the chamber in the midterm elections, it ended Hastert’s run as the longest-serving Republican House speaker and prompted him to leave Congress in 2007.

Now, Hastert faces his own scandal with allegations of a cover-up. It has already cost him his job at the lobbying firm he was working for, his spot on a corporate board, and his role at a center at Wheaton College that bears his name.

Foley did not immediately respond on to a message TPM left at a number listed for his West Palm Beach, Florida real estate firm requesting comment on the allegations against Hastert.

In light of what we now know about the secrets of his own Hastert was allegedly harboring, his condemnation of Foley back in 2006 drips with irony: “Congressman Foley duped a lot of people. … I have known him for all the years he served in this House. He deceived me, too.”

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Dc
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriter:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: