Dems Warn They Can’t Counter The Koch Brothers’ $1 Billion In 2016

When news broke Monday that conservative billionaire brothers David and Charles Koch (pictured) planned to spend almost $1 billion in the 2016 campaign cycle, Democrats fretted. Not only would that hefty sum be spent against them, but there’s no comparable billionaire on the left, Democrats noted to TPM, to counter that.

The new funding means that even in a cycle more favorable to Democrats than the last, they will face extreme fundraising pressures. The significance goes beyond just the amount of money the Kochs are spending, said Rick Hasen, an election law expert at University of California at Irvine.

“They also have a ground operation and can rival political parties in what they can do, both in influencing the [Republican] primary and in get out the vote and registration efforts in the general election,” Hasen wrote in an email to TPM.

The Kochs’ plan to spend $889 million through their network of 17 allied groups in the 2016 cycle would more than double the $407 million they spent in 2012. By comparison, the Republican National Committee and its Senate and House counterparts spent a total of $657 million in 2012.

“That amount of money can create all kinds of things,” said Nick Rathod, a former staffer in the Obama White House’s Office of Intergovernmental Affairs and founder of the State Innovation Exchange, which aims to be a liberal alternative to the conservative American Legislative Exchange Council. Through their network of organizations, the Kochs can shape “an issue environment” and frame debates around issues they want to focus on.

Rathod said “to have a billion dollars to spend on any kind of debate or frame around issues I think is very scary because you can just drown out any other voice.”

The problem is hard to remedy for Democrats. The spending advantage among the wealthiest Americans is with Republicans.

“There’s nothing on our side that can come close to matching that,” Rathod said, adding that even though people cite George Soros or other wealthy Democratic donors “we don’t have anything like that.”

“I don’t think we’re as strategic as the Kochs have been, particularly at the state and local level,” Rathod said.

Rathod’s sentiment is shared by Ben Ray, the communications director at the American Bridge 21st Century PAC.

“Nobody is going to show up with a billion dollars on the Democratic side of the aisle,” Ray told TPM. “And I think that’s okay because I think our donors understand why that would be and our donors in the Democratic Party understand why that sort of injection of money is bad for the people we want to help.”

Democrats expect the $1 billion to also affect the Republican candidates for president as well.

“They can essentially define an agenda for someone like a Scott Walker or a Chris Christie,” Rathod said.

After news broke about the spending, Democrats quickly warned of the effect that the $1 billion spending push could ultimately have on policy.

“The Koch brothers have one powerful fundraising advantage — what investors call Return on Investment. A Republican President would likely roll back environmental protections, worker protections and consumer protections which could benefit the Kochs and their corporations,” Peter Kauffman, a spokesman for the pro-Hillary Clinton Priorities USA Action super PAC said in a statement to TPM.

At this point, the Kochs have essentially “superseded” a political party, former top Obama adviser David Axelrod said to The New York Times.

“It’s no wonder the candidates show up when the Koch brothers call,” Axelrod said. “That’s exponentially more money than any party organization will spend. In many ways, they have superseded the party.”

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Dc
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: