White House Request For Feedback On Its Election Commission Backfired Bigly

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach listens to arguments before the Kansas Supreme Court in a petition by Democrat Chad Taylor to remove his name from the ballot after he withdrew from the U.S. Senate race Tuesday,... Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach listens to arguments before the Kansas Supreme Court in a petition by Democrat Chad Taylor to remove his name from the ballot after he withdrew from the U.S. Senate race Tuesday, Sept. 16, 2014, in Topeka, Kan. Kobach, a Republican, ruled that Taylor's name must remain on the ballot because he didn't comply with state election law. (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The White House solicited comments on its bogus “election integrity” commission that has so far faced nothing but setbacks and embarrassments, and the public feedback has been correspondingly negative—and hilarious.

The Trump administration this week posted public comments it received from the end of June through July 11, and it appears that the White House inbox has been flooded with angry Americans tearing into what the President himself has referred to as a “voter fraud panel.”

Some commenters expressed serious concern with the commission’s actions, including the worry that the commission’s request to states for the last four digits of voters’ social security numbers could open people up to bank fraud. Many states rejected the commission’s request for detailed data on voters, with some noting that sharing pieces of the requested data would violate state law.

Quite a few commenters politely urged the commission to withdraw its request for the data and offered suggestions for expanding voting rights and securing elections in the United States.

Others offered angry rebuttals and profanity-laden comments railing against the commission and its vice chair, Kris Kobach, the Republican Kansas secretary of state notorious for his efforts to restrict voting rights.

“You’re a disgusting fraud with no moral bearing whatsoever,” one commenter told Kobach.

The White House did not redact personal information, like home and email addresses, for those who submitted contacts. TPM only published screengrabs from the documents that do not include identifying information.

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for zsak zsak says:

    The White House did not redact personal information, like home and email addresses, for those who submitted contacts.

    And we are supposed to trust them with sensitive information like SSNs?

  2. The White House did not redact personal information, like home and email addresses, for those who submitted contacts.

    They know who their anonymous froggies are going to harass.

  3. The White House did not redact personal information, like home and email addresses, for those who submitted contacts.

  4. True, but by not withholding personal info, ‘1600’ basically made the trolls jobs, a lot easier.

  5. Next up: collecting ACA “horror” stories, which will also be published with complete home addresses, telephone numbers and medical histories.

    Winning.

    ETA: Barely six months ago this would’ve been considered scandalous. But now, in the alt-normal … Sad.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

7 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for thepsyker Avatar for inversion Avatar for joelopines Avatar for lastroth Avatar for greycardinal Avatar for edgarant Avatar for tiowally Avatar for zsak Avatar for maximus Avatar for kenga

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: