Chart: Super Committee Dems, GOP Differ On Jobs

UNITED STATES – OCTOBER 26: Committee co-chairs Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, and Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., prepare to conduct the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction hearing on “Discretionary Outlays, ... UNITED STATES – OCTOBER 26: Committee co-chairs Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, and Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., prepare to conduct the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction hearing on “Discretionary Outlays, Security and Non-Security” on Wednesday, Oct. 26, 2011. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call) MORE LESS

As noted previously, the deficit Super Committee is gridlocked largely because the GOP is unwilling to accept higher taxes on wealthy people as part of a compromise with Democrats that also cuts Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. But the parties also differ on the question of whether their recommendations should include any near term spending and/or tax cuts to give the weak economy a much-needed boost.

Recently committee Republicans and Democrats presented each other with competing plans — some details of which were leaked to the press. Aides note that the Dem plan contained about $300 billion in expansionary measures, while the GOP plan contained… well, see for yourself.

Yup, $0.00.

The GOP plan contained about $2.2 trillion in cuts — well over the $1.2 trillion minimum required of the Super Committee by the debt limit law. That left the Republicans ample room to include many kinds of near-term growth measures, but they picked none.

In the past, some Super Committee Republicans have contended that cutting spending is in and of itself a form of stimulus — expansionary austerity, if you will. But most experts dispute this idea, and Republicans themselves don’t even seem to believe it.

1
Show Comments