Brennan: Trump Camp’s Contacts With Russia Warranted Investigation

Former CIA Director John Brennan testifies on CapitolHill in Washington, Tuesday, May 23, 2017, before the House Intelligence Committee Russia Investigation Task Force. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
Former CIA Director John Brennan is sworn-in on CapitolHill in Washington, Tuesday, May 23, 2017, prior to testifying before the House Intelligence Committee Russia Investigation Task Force. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

In testimony Tuesday morning before the House Intelligence Committee, former CIA Director John Brennan gave the most straightforward explanation to date as to why U.S. intelligence agencies embarked last summer on a now-sprawling investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election and potential coordination between Russian officials and individuals connected to the Trump campaign.

In a cold, high-ceilinged, wood-paneled hearing room underneath the U.S. Capitol, Brennan repeated Tuesday what he and many other intelligence leaders have said before, that “Russia brazenly interfered in the 2016 election process.” While he said he does not know whether any Americans engaged in “actively conspiring” with Russia, he cited evidence of contacts between Russian officials and people associated with the Trump campaign troubling enough to warrant a serious investigation.

“I was concerned because of known Russian efforts to suborn such individuals,” he said. “And it raised questions in my mind again whether or not the Russians were able to gain the cooperation of those individuals.”

That cooperation, he noted, could have happened even without the knowledge of the U.S. participants. “Frequently, individuals who go along the treasonous path do not even realize they’re along that path until it gets to be a bit too late,” he said.

Asked if the individuals he was referring to were official members of the Trump campaign or merely people loosely associated with the president, Brennan declined to identify them, citing the classified nature of the intelligence in question.

Though Brennan did not mention any names in particular, recent reports about two individuals in Trump’s inner circle fit the pattern he described. Russian officials have bragged in recent weeks about their attempts to cultivate both Trump national security adviser Mike Flynn and campaign adviser Carter Page and use them to influence Trump. 

Brennan reiterated under questioning that interactions between political campaigns and foreign governments are not in and of themselves suspicious, but the fact that these contacts happened at the very time the CIA was learning about Russian attempts to hack and influence the 2016 election raised his suspicions and motivated him to push for a full investigation.

“I don’t have sufficient information to make a determination whether or not such cooperation or complicity or collusion was taking place,” he said. “But I know that there was a basis to have individuals pull those threads.”

Under questioning from Rep. Thomas Rooney (R-FL), Brennan said that he left office with “unresolved questions” about whether Russia had worked with any “U.S. persons” involved in the 2016 campaign to influence the outcome.

Based on what he knows about Russia from decades of work as an intelligence officer, Brennan said: “They try to suborn individuals and try to get individuals, including U.S. individuals, to act on their behalf—wittingly or unwittingly,” he said. “I was worried about the number of contacts that the Russians had with U.S. persons. Therefore, by the time I left office on January 20th, I had unresolved questions in my mind, as to whether or not the Russians had been successful in getting U.S. persons involved in the campaign or not to work on their behalf again either in a witting or unwitting fashion.”

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Sincerely,
TPM Staff
Latest Dc
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: