New Report Shows GOP Repeal Bill Will Inflict Pain On Red And Blue States Alike

Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., speaks to reporters outside the Senate Chamber about President Trump's speech to Congress, during the vote to confirm Ryan Zinke as President Donald Trump’s secretary of the Department of the Interior, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, March 1, 2017. A physician by training, Cassidy has introduced an Affordable Care Act alternative, called the Patient Freedom Act of 2017.  (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La. speaks to reporters outside the Senate Chamber on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, March 1, 2017, about President Trump's speech to Congress, during the Senate vote to confirm Interior ... Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La. speaks to reporters outside the Senate Chamber on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, March 1, 2017, about President Trump's speech to Congress, during the Senate vote to confirm Interior Secretary-designate Ryan Zinke. A physician by training, Cassidy has introduced an Affordable Care Act alternative, called the Patient Freedom Act of 2017. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) MORE LESS

A new report released Wednesday morning reveals just how much states could lose under the Senate GOP’s latest Obamacare repeal bill—in total, a decrease of $215 billion dollars in federal health care spending by 2026 and more than $4 trillion cut by 2036, according to the report by the health care consulting group Avalere.

The Senate could potentially vote next week on the Graham-Cassidy bill to repeal much of the Affordable Care Act and convert Medicaid into a dwindling block grant. The bill’s Republican backers acknowledge that there will be winners and losers under the plan, but they are planning to bring the bill to a vote without getting a complete analysis from the Congressional Budget Office of its cost and expected coverage losses, making independent assessments like Avalere’s among the few data points for analyzing the bill’s impact.

Under the bill’s formula, which largely redistributes money from blue states to red states, large, progressive states that expanded Medicaid under Obamacare would see the biggest cuts, with California and New York each losing tens of billions of dollars over the next decade under the plan. It’s important to note, however, that several states represented by Republicans in the Senate who are undecided on the bill, including Maine, Alaska, West Virginia, Ohio, and Arizona, would also see painful cuts.

The report’s first chart shows how much—in billions—states would gain or lose in federal dollars over the first decade after the bill goes into effect.

Cumulative Change in Federal Funding to States Under Graham-Cassidy Compared to Current Law, 2020-2026

The worst cuts, however, come in the second decade after the bill is enacted, when much lower growth rates in Medicaid per-capita spending kick in, and when the block grant funding expires altogether. Avalere modeled what would happen to federal health care spending after 2026 under the Graham-Cassidy plan, and found that the entire country would face a fiscal cliff, and that even the states that were “winners” in the first few years of the bill would see sharp reductions further down the road.

Cumulative Change in Federal Funding to States Under Graham-Cassidy Compared to Current Law, 2020-2036

The Graham-Cassidy bill, which could come to the Senate floor without a complete CBO score and after only one committee hearing, would end federal support for Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion and tax credits starting in 2020, kill the individual and employer mandates, and allow state governments to waive many of the core protections in the ACA—such as the rule banning insurers from charging people with pre-existing conditions higher rates.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Dc
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: