Federal Appeals Courts Clash Over Obamacare Subsidies

President Barack Obama applauds during an event in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Monday, June 9, 2014, where he signed a Presidential Memorandum on reducing the burden of student loan debt. The pres... President Barack Obama applauds during an event in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Monday, June 9, 2014, where he signed a Presidential Memorandum on reducing the burden of student loan debt. The president said the rising costs of college have left America's middle class feeling trapped. He says no hard-working youngster in America should be priced out of a higher education. Obama signed a presidential memorandum he says could help an additional 5 million borrowers. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Obamacare against a sweeping challenge to its federal subsidies on Tuesday. A three-judge panel unanimously ruled that the statute permits the federal exchange — and not just state-run exchanges — to provide subsidies.

“[W]e find that the applicable statutory language is ambiguous and subject to multiple interpretations. Applying deference to the IRS’s determination, however, we uphold the rule as a permissible exercise of the agency’s discretion,” Judge Roger Gregory wrote for the court.

The ruling came within hours of a separate ruling by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals that the federal exchange was not permitted to provide subsidies, dealing a major blow to the law. The vote there was 2-1. The Obama administration said it intends to seek a full bench ruling which could conceivably reverse the outcome of the D.C. Circuit decision.

In the 4th Circuit decision, Gregory wrote that it’s “clear that widely available tax credits are essential to fulfilling the Act’s primary goals and that Congress was aware of their importance when drafting the bill.” He noted that only 16 state-run Obamacare exchanges are currently in place and that the economic framework for the law would “crumble” without federal exchange subsidies.

“Furthermore, without an exception to the individual mandate, millions more Americans unable to purchase insurance without the credits would be forced to pay a penalty that Congress never envisioned imposing on them,” he wrote. “The IRS Rule avoids both these unforeseen and undesirable consequences and thereby advances the true purpose and means of the Act.”

Gregory was recess-appointed by Bill Clinton and then formally nominated by George W. Bush. His opinion was joined by Obama-appointed Judges Stephanie Thacker and Andre M. Davis.

The 4th Circuit court’s active bench includes 14 members: 5 Republican nominees and 9 Democratic nominees (including Gregory).

This article has been updated.

ACA 4th Circuit Ruling

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for xyxox xyxox says:

    Once the 1st circuit reverses its ruling in an en banc decision, the SCOTUS will be able to simply not grant cert on the inevitable appeals to both decisions, thus allowing the subsidies to stand.

  2. I was wondering about this. Are you certain of it?

  3. Avatar for msny msny says:

    Ditto. Wondering also. Do you have a link that supports this?

  4. What will Boehner say now?


  5. Does that mean that the Supreme Court won’t take this on at all?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

107 more replies


Avatar for doremus_jessup Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for someguy Avatar for ggordonl Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for fgs Avatar for sooner Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for radicalcentrist Avatar for mames5 Avatar for arrrrrj Avatar for thunderhawk Avatar for ctvoter Avatar for xyxox Avatar for fourlegsgood Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for jeloso Avatar for jdfromca Avatar for foolmemore Avatar for dryheat Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for emilianoelmexicano

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: