The GOP’s Gerrymander Monopoly Could End Through These Key Gov Races

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A number of states currently under full GOP control—including Wisconsin, South Dakota, Kansas, Michigan and Ohio—allow the governor veto power over district maps drawn by the state legislature. With less than four weeks to go before Election Day, Democrats are either in the lead or in close races to retake the governor’s mansion in those states.

Redistricting experts say that winning just this one office represents Democrats’ best opportunity to have a voice in the once-a-decade redistricting process that next rolls around in 2021—and block the GOP from locking in majorities for another 10 years.

“The Republican gerrymander at the state legislative level is even more solid than the gerrymander of the U.S. House,” David Daley of FairVote, an electoral reform group, told TPM. “So if Democrats want to have a seat at the table in 2020 redistricting, the best way in many otherwise competitive states that are friendly to Democrats requires winning the governor’s mansion.”

“Governors are key in this process, and can be a powerful check and balance on efforts to gerrymander,” the Brennan Center’s Michael Li concurred.

Good government and redistricting reform groups like former Attorney General Eric Holder’s outfit, the National Democratic Redistricting Committee (NDRC), are well aware of these stakes. In laying out their targets for 2018, the NDRC said its goal was to break trifecta control—GOP rule of both houses of state legislatures and the governorship—to make sure “Democrats have a seat at the table.”

“What we know about redistricting is that the most extreme maps always emerge when one party has total control of the process,” Daley said.

To illustrate just how important governors can be to these battles, Li brought up the examples of Wisconsin and Minnesota. The 2010 Republican wave election gave the GOP total control in the Badger State, while in Minnesota, Republicans won both houses of the legislature, losing the governorship, by a hair, to Democrat Mark Dayton. When the redistricting process came around in 2011, following the 2010 Census, the two states ended up with starkly different outcomes.

In Wisconsin, Li said, the GOP “went to town and drew one of the most aggressive gerrymanders that the country’s ever seen in the state assembly.” Republican Gov. Scott Walker signed off on the maps, which were subsequently challenged in a case that went all the way to the Supreme Court.

In Minnesota, Dayton “was able to veto a very bad Republican gerrymander, which kicked the process to the courts. And the courts drew a map which has been much more responsive to electoral shifts.”

Control of Minnesota’s House has flipped from Democrats in 2012 to Republicans in 2014 and could flip back to Democrats in 2018.

Wisconsin, meanwhile, has been safely Republican for the past decade. In 2012, Democratic candidates for the state assembly earned over 174,000 more votes than their Republican counterparts, but Republicans took 60 of the 99 seats.

“2016 proved so uncompetitive that half—fully 49 percent of those seats—went uncontested by either major party,” Daley noted.

The Midwest has been an epicenter of Republican control post-2010, but Democrats are currently leading in the governor’s races in Illinois, Michigan and Minnesota, as Governing magazine recently reported. Walker is also in trouble in Wisconsin, while Democrats are making a strong showing in other states like Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, and South Dakota where the governor has either veto control over or a key role in the redistricting process.

Michigan’s case is distinct. Voters Not Politicians, a citizens group, succeeded in getting a constitutional amendment on the November ballot that, if it passes, will take control of the map-drawing process away from state lawmakers.

The huge enthusiasm for that effort, which gained over 400,000 signatures, is a testament to how enduring the effects of Michigan’s 2010 gerrymander have been. Democrats won more total votes in state House races in 2012, 2014 and 2016, but failed to take back control.

As redistricting reform advocates are quick to point out, gerrymandering is not exclusively a Republican problem. In Maryland, where redistricting is actually run out of the governor’s office, then-Gov. Martin O’Malley worked with the Democratic legislature to secure a 7-1 Democratic congressional gerrymander in 2010.

At a Baltimore event in September, Democratic gubernatorial candidate Ben Jealous said he would push the balance to 8-0 if he’s elected.

Dan Vicuña, national redistricting director at Common Cause, said these sorts of winner-take-all-approaches represent a “very short-sighted” view of how the process should work. Where they have full control, Democrats and Republicans are prone to making the kind of power grab they couldn’t stomach if control changed hands.

“It’s in the best interest of both parties to really hedge their bets and come up with some sort of real reform effort,” Vicuña told TPM. “Be that independent commissions or something with a partisan balance that prevents one party from steamrolling the other.”

Assuming that those efforts don’t come to pass and the process remains fiercely political, a wave of Democratic governorships in red states could result in “deadlock” over maps, according to Vicuña. As in Minnesota, that could mean the process gets kicked to the courts, which Vicuña said have historically “hewed somewhat closely to the lines that the state legislatures have drawn.”

But after a decade of gerrymandering games and drawn-out legal battles, the courts have started turning to special masters who’ve ignored the legislatures’ suggestions entirely.

“I think the courts will be far less likely to be deferential to the districts that legislators are proposing and more likely to start from scratch,” Vicuña said.

Latest DC
46
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for jmacaz jmacaz says:

    The only way gerrymandering will ever end is if all districts are drawn using the same algorithm. The program which implements the algorithm should be open source, and the data should be available to all for inspection. The good news is such a program already exists.

    The data to be used would have to be determined, but one thing that should NOT be in the data is political affiliation. At a minimum inputs would be census data (population) and zip code.

    This will bring howls from both Republicans and Democrats, but that’s too bad.

  2. Michigan’s Voters Not Politicians TV spot is one of the best I’ve ever seen.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXPGNfh5l3E
    The Chamber of Commerce at present is doing Facebook Obama is coming for you bits, but I expect the Elders of Soros TV spots momentarily.
  3. Avatar for fgs fgs says:

    I like the idea of a fair and neutral algorithm. What’s really needed is a Constitutional amendment mandating the criteria: equal population, compact, contiguous, minimal city/county splits, competitive and proportional. The FEC should have a redistricting committee, composed of 1 nominee by the Speaker of the House, 1 by the Senate Majority Leader, and 1 each by the minority leaders of each party. The maps should be approved unanimously.

  4. Avatar for jmacaz jmacaz says:

    I don’t know if its an amendment that is needed (that would easily take 10 years to accomplish, and I don’t think we can wait that long), but some legislation would be necessary for sure. I am in agreement with most of your criteria, although I am unsure what you mean by competitive and proportional?

  5. How would a uniform algorithm end gerrymandering?

    As I interpret Article 1, Section 4 of the Constitution, the federal Congress would have to enact a law mandating such an algorithm. In today’s environment, the GOP would call the shots as to how that algorithm would be developed and implemented. It would be similar to the Kavanaugh nomination. The Dems could bring in all the experts they wished, and the GOP would ramrod their choice through anyway.

    And it’s doubtful the states would support such a move to begin with.

    What am I missing here? How do you envision your proposal would manifest?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

40 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for jmundstuk Avatar for fgs Avatar for meri Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for ajileye Avatar for downriverdem Avatar for sniffit Avatar for eastlansing Avatar for martinstett Avatar for bboerner Avatar for dickweed Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for lamitatron1 Avatar for philbilly Avatar for bankerpup Avatar for joriep Avatar for birdford Avatar for machoneman Avatar for jmacaz Avatar for dnfree Avatar for j_publicus Avatar for majesticunicorn Avatar for anothertpmreader

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: