Ladies, Stop Contorting Yourselves To Compete In A Game That Is Rigged

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Last week, the White House took several steps to protect college students from rape: releasing a task force report which included many recommendations for universities; announcing a new website (NotAlone.gov), which will serve as a resource for survivors; and deploying several celebrity-studded public service announcements. Two days later, in an unprecedented display of transparency, the Department of Education released a list of 55 schools currently under investigation for allegedly mishandling rape and sexual assault allegations.

A couple of weeks before that, Reps. Ileana Ros-Lethinen (R-FL) and Lois Capps (D-CA) introduced The Truth in Advertising Act. If passed, it would direct the Federal Trade Commission to develop a strategy to reduce the use of images that have been “altered to materially change the physical characteristics of the faces and bodies of the individuals depicted,” because evidence shows that such images cause “distorted and unrealistic expectations and understandings of appropriate and healthy weight and body image” and has “been linked to eating disorders.”

As a feminist—and a woman—these developments leave me happy, heartened. It’s about time the government step up on these issues. Bravo, I want to cheer.

And yet.

A part of me can’t help but feel a bit cynical.

It’s not that these aren’t problems worth addressing, or that these moves by the government aren’t important—or, all things considered, pretty freaking impressive. On the contrary. These issues are serious and pervasive; that our government is wading into these waters at all is a victory, and is, in fact, the very sort of action the feminist in me (and those around me) has been calling for, for years.

And yet.

From my As-A-Woman vantage point, it’s impossible not to notice that what’s going on here is way bigger and far more insidious than it first appears. I guess I’ve become a tad jaded; call it a hazard of the female condition. But what we don’t talk about when we talk about sexual assault and eating disorders is what has me, well, not quite ready to bust out the pom-poms.

Eating disorders are devastating; they are the most deadly of all mental disorders. But, without diminishing that truth, consider: A girlfriend once declared, during a ladies happy hour, “I think every woman has at least a little bit of an eating disorder.” No one disagreed. (And, I might add, we did most of our growing up before Photoshop was even invented.)

Yes, we like to believe we are too smart to buy into the idea that the women we see splashed all over the media are real, too enlightened to compare our bodies to theirs. Yes, intellectually, we’re aware that the “perfect” women staring back from screens and glossy pages have been digitally elongated, cinched, enhanced, and smoothed. We bitch about this, knowingly, over cocktails.

What we aren’t so quick to share is that this knowledge doesn’t change the fact that, sometimes, our day is made or broken by a number on a scale or a pair of jeans feeling too tight or the sight of ourselves in a dressing room mirror—or, for that matter, a newly-discovered wrinkle or a gray hair we didn’t notice until we hit the bathroom at work. That on those days, we feel somehow diminished, a little less worthy.

We like to believe we’re above such nonsense.

And yet. No matter how smart we are, and no matter how many condescending, self-serving, faux-empowering Real Beauty ad campaigns Dove rolls out, on a deeper level—somewhere in the painful pit of our stomachs—we understand: thin is just better.

And I believe my friends’ words would apply equally to the question of college sexual assault. Yes, the official numbers are one in five; but, among my closest girlfriends, I can’t think of a single one—myself included—who emerged from college completely unscathed.

Comedian Amy Schumer does a bit about the “gray area” around rape, which she calls—because word mashups—grape. Here’s what she told Fresh Air’s Terry Gross about it last year:

“Most women I know that I’m close to have had a sexual experience that they were really uncomfortable [with]. If it wasn’t completely rape, it was something very similar to rape. And so I say it’s not all black and white. There’s a gray area of rape, and I call it ‘grape.’ It’s the guy you went home with in college, and you said, ‘No,” and then he still did it, or maybe you woke up and it was someone you were dating… every girl I know has had some experience that is kind of like ‘grape.’”

Me too: I don’t believe I know anyone who hasn’t had such an experience. And I’m guessing that the same goes for you—yes, you—whether you’re aware of it or not: among your friends, coworkers, sisters, daughters—rare is the woman who has been spared entirely.

I don’t say this to discount the horrors of rape or full-blown eating disorders; but just because sometimes the damage is subtler does not mean no damage has been done.

Nor do I say this to belittle what the government is doing; its actions on these issues represent progress, as far as I’m concerned. But such measures would not be necessary if we did not live in a culture where women are viewed as objects, inferior. This idea is everywhere; it is the water we swim in.

Women, men: we’re all in the pool.

And that’s what really needs to change. Dealing with the most extreme symptoms and results of living in such a culture is good, necessary. But a culture of sexual assault, of men viewing women as objects to be conquered, a culture of women believing their worth is tied to their appearance as measured against a wholly arbitrary, yet completely accepted, standard of beauty—that doesn’t come from nowhere. That comes from everywhere.

And who wants to gaze into the abyss? Who wants to talk about something so huge as to feel impossible? It’s so much easier to just tune out.

Or to absolve oneself of confronting this reality at all, and instead turn inward, “fix” what’s “wrong.” And I suppose that’s how we’ve wound up with self-help being packaged and sold as “feminism.” Books like Lean In, The Confidence Code, and What Works for Women at Work masquerade as barrier-busting manifestos, while their authors brush away critics who suggest that they might consider addressing the larger structural inequities that create and perpetuate the problems they explore, as though it were even possible to separate one from the other, the circumstances—a lack of confidence, a wariness of “leaning in”—from the cause. When, of course, there is no separation. They are all of a piece.

Jessica Valenti recently penned a takedown of The Confidence Code; its authors Katty Kay and Claire Shipman responded that they agree with Valenti: lack of confidence in women is “a reflection of a culture that gives women no reason to feel self-assured.”

But they then went on to explain why women should fix themselves (in their case, by becoming more confident), rather than waste their time focusing on “the reality that the game isn’t entirely fair.”

Meanwhile, Joan Williams and her daughter Rachel Dempsey, who wrote What Works, advise women to “Act like a duck: Glide on the surface and paddle like hell underneath.”

I’m sorry, but is that a joke?

Don’t get me wrong: I’m sure many of the things these books suggest are well-intentioned, useful tactics for navigating the sexist realities of the modern world.

And yet.

When a game is unfair, doesn’t it make more sense to try to fix it than to make half the players twist and contort to squeeze themselves into some ill-fitting form (quack, quack)? Granted, if a game is unfair, those who are unfairly advantaged aren’t likely to call for sweeping change, but, for the love of god, shouldn’t those of us on the losing end be demanding it? Rather than try to change ourselves to survive in a world that’s unfair, shouldn’t we work to create a world where women are as respected and valued as men?

(And doesn’t the fact that we so readily choose to focus on ourselves rather than the world kind of prove just how impossibly huge the divide is?)

Again, it’s just easier to look away.

Admittedly, the question of Lean In and its ilk is trivial in comparison to things like eating disorders and sexual assault. And again, any action seeking to make the world a little better, a little safer for women is to be celebrated. The actions of the White House task force on campus sexual assault are hugely commendable, and the Truth in Advertising bill is an awesome statement. These are big steps.

And yet.

They are not enough. And again, I’m left wondering: What will it take for us to be wiling to make the changes that would render such measures unnecessary?

Shannon Kelley is a writer and author based in California who writes frequently on the intersection of feminism, pop culture, and politics. Follow her on Twitter @Shannon_BKelley.

Latest Cafe

Notable Replies

  1. You can see her thong. Just sayin’.

  2. Avatar for clk clk says:

    I would like at ask a question here. I am a 60 something woman who never experienced an unwanted sexual situation during college, does that mean what I think it does, well anyway it is true that the “Madison Ave” image has haunted us our entire lives. I have fought it over many years while raising our children No Barbies and No guns pretty much were iron clad rules.

    Anyway my question is, is there any room in this discussion for some concern or compassion for the considerate male who would somehow get caught in the crossfire of this discussion? What about the young man who would wrongly be painted with that black brush by a very dysfunctional female, and then have to carry the baggage and trauma then? My husband who was a professor in a nursing program and at the time the majority of students were women was accused of sexual harassment. The case went through the lawyers, depositions and a pretty public process through other faculty. The college settled rather than allow the case to go to court, leaving a black cloud of ??guilty?? over him. In later months, years it was found that the woman had other situations like this, and also that this young women’s ideas were actually encouraged, if not downright fostered by other female faculty with their own anger/dysfunctional issues. That has been probably 20 years ago and to this day my husband still carries the scars of this unfounded accusation and what he felt like was a betrayal of the college for their settlement.

    I know that is a long winded approach, but I have a son and grandson who are good people and who have not been involved in aggressive and inappropriate sexual behavior but who because of the behavior of others could get hit at any moment by a stray bullet or accusation. How do we solve the obvious problem of male bias and inappropriate perceptions without damaging those who are not inclined that way?

    A second question is how do we emphasize and teach that the girl/woman needs to be responsible for her behavior and choices, that she cannot and should not put herself in situations that could have the worst outcome. It may not be fair but maybe they can’t try and drink the guys under the table and be absolutely safe. It is like the lesson you teach children at the beach, never turn your back on the ocean, because there is always the potential for a rogue wave to take you down, enjoy the beach but always be cautious. It seems now a days that to try and make that point with women is to be accused of justifying bad male behavior.

    Is there a middle ground that can be addressed or has the game been permanently rigged against both sides?

  3. Hmm. Lots to think about here (excuse me, but perhaps because the first half was a bit disjointed and disconnected from the last portion of the article…).
    As a woman trying to make it in a male dominated world, i don’t necessarily feel overtly discriminated against, although there are the guys who go out to lunch together and never ask me, the managers who have great relationships with the clients because they go to hockey or basketball games together or play golf together, and ugh, the worst is all that fantasy football talk i hear in the hallways. Comparing cell phones, that’s always annoying too.
    But i feel i’m fairly close to where i should be in my career because i got to where i am by working hard, paying my dues, and not relying on being a skinny bean pole with a low cut blouse. There is definitely a confidence gap, and i found the linked article to be much more relatable and focused that this one was (again, my apologies for the criticism because I realize it is already difficult enough to put yourself out there with an article like this one.)

  4. Avatar for maxie maxie says:

    What started out as a quasi on topic rant about sexual harassment and sexual assault on campuses devolved quickly into an all around feminist complaint. Some good points were made above so I’ll skip them and just say that if women are tired of being treated like sex objects or being sexually harassed, perhaps it might help if they pick up the slack in the mating process. Risk rejection, make the approach, ask men out, pay for the dating process, make the first move, and if it becomes serious enough for marriage, women can perhaps spend 1/4 of their annual salary on an engagement ring for her guy. Otherwise I guess you’ll just have to make yourself skinny and attractive and wait until a man takes the bait and does all the work like it’s always been. And perhaps that man will be clumsy about it, perhaps you’re not interested but he can’t read teh signals and charges in anyway, perhaps he’ll do it at an inappropriate time or place. That’s just the price you pay as long as your game is to wait and look good enough for ‘Mr Right’ to make the approach.

    As far as the confidence thing…of course men project more confidence, they have to, women typically aren’t attracted to men without it. So even if you don’t have it, if you’re a man you have to at least fake it until you make it or you’re just not dating material. It’s still incumbent on a man to cross the room, approach the woman you don’t know or barely know and make the move, risk rejections and if rejected, somehow maintain that confidence enough to do it again with someone else.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

2 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for clk Avatar for mulholland Avatar for maxie Avatar for dave48 Avatar for jtgeomom Avatar for julimac Avatar for 538liberal

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: