The For The People Act Still Has Life. But You Wouldn’t Know It From Reading The Coverage.

The more news stories that wrongfully declare a bill dead, the harder it is to mobilize people to fight for it — the declaration becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 14: Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and U.S. President Joe Biden speak briefly to reporters as they arrive at the U.S. Capitol for a Senate Democratic luncheon on July 14, 2021 in Wa... WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 14: Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and U.S. President Joe Biden speak briefly to reporters as they arrive at the U.S. Capitol for a Senate Democratic luncheon on July 14, 2021 in Washington, DC. President Biden is on the Hill to discuss with Senate Democrats the $3.5 trillion reconciliation package they have reached overnight that would expand Medicare benefits, boost federal safety net programs, and combat climate change. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

This article is part of TPM Cafe, TPM’s home for opinion and news analysis.

Right before the Senate left for recess earlier this month, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) attempted to once again force a vote on the For The People Act (S. 1), the most significant fair elections bill in generations. All fifty Democratic senators voted to bring the bill from committee to the full Senate floor, but because Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) objected to moving forward immediately, there could not be a motion to proceed to debate it. 

Schumer, undeterred, promised that protecting voting rights will be the upper body’s first order of business in September, even scheduling a vote to begin debate on S. 1 when the Senate returns.

The HuffPost’s Paul Blumenthal summed it up well: all this maneuvering “showed that [Schumer] intends to keep pushing for the bill.” This alone is a major victory for grassroots activists who have been waging an inspiring months-long battle to keep the bill at the forefront of the Senate’s agenda. 

While significant hurdles remain over the next month — including getting senators on board with reforming the filibuster — there is a growing sense that the fight for the For The People Act can be won. Democrats are reportedly nearing an agreement on a revised version of the bill — one that will firmly unify the caucus. And moderate senators are increasingly arguing that filibuster reform may be necessary. 

“There is a path ahead toward passage of the For The People Act,” Michael Sozan, senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, told us. “That path may be winding and dangerous at times, but there is a route to the summit. People have to remember that transformative legislation is never enacted easily; just think of the Affordable Care Act or the Voting Rights Act, for example.” 

Jana Morgan, director of the Declaration for American Democracy coalition, echoed this sentiment: “We are closer to passing comprehensive voting rights legislation than we’ve been in decades, and Leader Schumer made it clear that the For the People Act will be the top priority when they return from the August recess — and we need to hold him to it.”

Passing the For The People Act would be a monumental achievement. The bill would ban congressional gerrymandering, establish strong federal standards to ensure the freedom to vote (including same-day and automatic voter registration, robust early voting periods, and simple vote-by-mail procedures), and create public financing for congressional elections. In no uncertain terms, the bill would bring us closer than we’ve ever been to a government of, by and for the people. 

For this reason, the House adopted the For The People Act in March with near-unanimous Democratic approval, and President Biden called passing it a “national imperative.” 

Beyond providing hope for the future of our democracy, the flurry of recent activity — by grassroots activists and those inside the halls of Congress — is a stunning rebuke to political pundits who have spent months declaring the bill dead and questioning whether it was ever a politically realistic avenue for strengthening democracy. 

The naysayers have routinely pointed to the supposedly immutable Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) and the insurmountable filibuster as proof that the bill is a waste of time. Yet, they ignore the grassroots activists who are doing everything they can to keep the bill alive — with tangible success. Activists brought Manchin back to the negotiating table after he initially announced his opposition to the bill, and have been increasingly lobbying against the filibuster to build pressure to reform it. And now, the bill has renewed momentum and a chance at passage. 

“The pundits have been consistently and embarrassingly wrong in proclaiming the For the People Act dead,” Sozan said.

Among the most outspoken critics of S. 1 is Nate Cohn of the New York Times, whose Twitter feed is but a neverending tally of why he thinks activists pouring their blood, sweat, and tears into fighting for the bill are wasting their time — or, worse, being negligent. He has not only written off the For the People Act and the movement to pass it as “totally unserious” but also postulated that the egregious anti-voter laws under consideration across our country are not urgent threats to democracy. 

It’s not just Cohn, though. The Beltway press adopted futility about the For The People Act as if it were fact. An episode of the NYT’s The Daily asked, “What lessons can we take from [the For The People Act’s] demise?” Vox declared that S. 1 was “doomed.” Politico Playbook, before the June vote that was filibustered by the GOP, editorialized that the For the People Act was simply a “messaging bill” that was “set to die” and would be killed “once and for all.” MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell once reported, with no justification, that S. 1 was “too big, too broad” and “really a talking point rather than legislation.” And just last week, The New Republic called Democrats’ voting rights push “doomed” and said S. 1 had “fizzled in the Senate” — with no mention of last week’s movement on S. 1 or the grassroots movement fighting for it.

Getting the story right matters, not only because it’s pundits’ and journalists’ job, but because it affects what happens on the ground. The more news stories that wrongfully declare a bill dead, the harder it is to mobilize people to fight for it — the declaration becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. In many respects, that grassroots activists have accomplished as much as they have, in such a hostile media environment, is a true testament to the strength of the movement.

The For the People Act is a crucially necessary piece of legislation, and the ills plaguing American democracy will only metastasize if left unaddressed. Our ability to confront the problems facing our nation — from the climate crisis to wealth inequality — depends upon having a functional, representative democracy where all voices can be heard. 

Grassroots activists and Democratic leadership have defied the odds, kept the pressure up, and now the For The People Act is within reach. It’s critical that during the Senate recess Americans continue to raise their voices. This means pushing reluctant senators and President Biden — who has not yet taken an overly active role in the fight — to do whatever it takes to pass the For The People Act. 

“The fight for civil rights has always been a tough battle, but our voices are being heard and we must continue to move forward together,” Morgan said. “In the coming months, we have the chance to ensure that our democracy and our freedom to vote is protected for generations to come, but that change will require unrelenting pressure from the American people to force action by our elected leaders. We cannot stand down.”

As activists rise to the moment, one can only hope that the pundits will finally begin covering this fight fairly. Our democracy is far too important to blot with undeserved cynicism and haughtiness.  

 


Mahnoor Imran is an Equal Citizens Fellow. 

Adam Eichen is Executive Director of Equal Citizens and coauthor of Daring Democracy (Beacon Press, 2017)

Latest Cafe

Notable Replies

  1. Democrats should just put voting reforms into the reconciliation bill. It’s a lot easier to let the presiding officer, VP Harris, rule that it is allowed in the bill than to try to get all 50 democrat senators to reform the filibuster. Since it takes 60 votes to overrule the presiding officer on what goes into a reconciliation bill, senators like Manchin and Sinema could vote with all the republicans, but that still would not be enough to overrule the presiding officer. Once that vote is out of the way, Manchin and Sinema could say they fulfilled their commitments and then vote for the final reconciliation bill.

  2. There are powerful forces at work to pass this bill. In fact, given the tendency of too many people on our side to grow complacent, I could mount an argument that we should be vigilant and aggressive on this legislation to the moment (and beyond) Biden signs it into Law.

  3. Perhaps some good voting news?

    Sound like anyone we already know?

    "business and divorce records reveal troubling – and previously unreported – behavior. “The documents detail accusations that Walker repeatedly threatened his ex-wife, exaggerated claims of financial success and alarmed business associates with unpredictable behavior.”

  4. I’m pretty sure that Manchin has weighed in, saying he’s not onboard with stuffing the reconciliation bill with non-revenue pieces and overruling the parliamentarian. He’s made it known that if they tried going ahead with this strategy, it wouldn’t get the necessary 50 votes for passage.

    Any way you slice it, you will have to contend with Manchin and his “regular order” obsession. He’s against any and all parliamentary tricks that the Dems might try employing to get around the current impasse (which would, totally coincidentally, also remove him from the spotlight).

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

19 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for honeyboywilson Avatar for sparrowhawk Avatar for drriddle Avatar for davcbr Avatar for dangoodbar Avatar for breccia Avatar for southerndem Avatar for joriep Avatar for noonm Avatar for birdford Avatar for maximus Avatar for garrybee Avatar for emiliano4

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: