This article is part of TPM Cafe, TPM’s home for opinion and news analysis.
The Biden administration is likely celebrating a better-than-expected jobs report, which showed surging employment and wages. However, for millions of working Americans, being employed doesn’t guarantee a living income.
As scholars interested in the well-being of workers, we believe that the economy runs better when people aren’t forced to choose between paying rent, buying food or getting medicine. Yet too many are compelled to do just that.
Determining just how many workers struggle to make ends meet is a complicated task. A worker’s minimum survival budget can vary considerably based on where the person lives and how many people are in the family.
Take Rochester, New York. It has a cost of living that’s closest to the national average across 509 U.S. metropolitan areas, according to the City Cost of Living Index compiled by the research firm AdvisorSmith.
MIT’s living wage calculator shows that a single adult living in Rochester needs at least US$30,000 a year to cover the cost of housing, food, transportation and other basic needs.
But in San Francisco, which AdvisorSmith data indicate is the U.S. city with the highest cost of living, affording just the basics costs $47,587, mainly due to significantly higher taxes and rents.
The city with the lowest cost of living is Beckley, West Virginia. Even there, a childless worker still needs to earn about $28,200 to make essential ends meet. Again, the average American city has a cost of living of around $30,000 a year for a single person.
Of course, costs add up quickly for households with more than one person. Two adults in Rochester need over $48,000 a year, while a single parent with one child needs more than $63,000. In San Francisco, a single parent would need to earn $101,000 a year just to scrape by.
So that’s what it takes to survive in today’s America. About $30,000 a year for a single person without dependents in the average city – a little less in some cities, and much, much more for families and anyone who lives in a major city like San Francisco or New York.
But we estimate that at least 27 million U.S. workers don’t earn enough to hit that very low threshold of $30,000, based on the latest occupation wage data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a government agency, from May 2020. We believe this is a conservative estimate and that the number of people with jobs who earn less than what’s necessary to afford the necessities of life is likely much higher.
Low-income occupations encompass a wide range of jobs, from bus drivers to cleaners to administrative assistants. However, the majority of those 27 million workers are concentrated in two industries: retail trade and leisure and hospitality. These two industries are among America’s largest employers and pay the lowest average wages.
For example, the median salary for cashiers was $28,850 in early 2020, with 2.5 million of the nation’s 5 million cashiers earning less than that. Or take retail sales. There, 75% of workers – about 1.8 million – were earning less than $27,080 a year.
It’s the same story for leisure and hospitality, the industry that took the hardest hit from the COVID-19 pandemic, hemorrhaging 6 million jobs in April 2020 as much of the U.S. economy shut down. At the time, close to a million waiters and waitresses were earning less than the median income of $23,740.
Of course, millions of those jobs have returned, and wages have been surging this year – though only slightly more than inflation. But that doesn’t change the basic math that roughly 1 in 6 workers is making less than what’s necessary for an adult with no kids to survive.
That’s why it’s hardly surprising that 40% of U.S. households reported in 2018 that they couldn’t afford an emergency $400 expense.
To us, these figures should cause policymakers to redefine who counts among the “working poor.” A 2021 Bureau of Labor Statistics report estimated that in 2019 about 6.3 million workers earned less than the poverty rate.
But this situation drastically understates the scope of the working poor because the federal poverty line is unrealistically low – only $12,880 for an individual. The official poverty line was created to determine eligibility for Medicaid and other government benefits that support low-income people, not to indicate how much a person needs to actually get by.
Writer James Truslow Adams coined the phrase “The American Dream” in 1931 to describe a society in which he hoped anyone could attain the “fullest stature of which they are innately capable.” That depended on having a good job that paid a living wage.
Unfortunately, for many millions of hard-working Americans, the “better and richer and fuller” life Adams wrote about remains just a dream.
Jeffrey Kucik is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Arizona and Don Leonard is an Assistant Professor of Practice in City and Regional Planning atThe Ohio State University.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Those who forget the past are condemned to relive it. Personally, I am sick and tired of paying taxes to subsidize Walmart and McDonald’s making billions by under paying its workers. It will take Government action to make jobs in today’s economy pay living wages this just like it took Government action 80 to 100 years ago to make mining and manufacturing jobs safe and pay a living wage.
“You load 16 tons and what you get,
Another day older and deeper in debt
Saint Peter don’t ya call me cause I can’t go
I owe my soul to the company store”.
That song was about what coal mining and manufacturing jobs were like before progressive policies turned them in to safe employment paying a living wage.
The problem has been that for some reason, today’s America looks differently at unions and today’s workers. That is today’s America thinks that the jobs made living by progressive policies 80 to 100 years ago were always good jobs and the jobs in the service economy just are not as valuable.
But make no mistake, the only reason manufacturing and mining jobs are “good paying safe jobs” is because of liberal progressive policies that forced good pay and safe working conditions. Furthermore, if America really wants to increase its standard of living and stop incurring Government spending costs for subsidizing less than living wages, what was done by Government for manufacturing and mining jobs 80 to 100 years ago must now be done for jobs in today’s economy.
Fun fact:
Tennessee Ernie Ford’s dad was Clarence Thomas Ford.
While I agree with this article, I do wish that Democrats could just unabashedly celebrate good economic news without qualifiers. Nearly 1 million jobs added in July is an astoundingly good number.
And its not like the Democrats aren’t pushing solutions to these problems. Some have gotten passed (monthly child tax credit payment), while others have not ($15 min wage, thanks Sinema /s). The true barrier is rarely Democrats as much as its the GQP and the unequal structure of our government (i.e. Senate inequality/filibuster, House gerrymandering, etc).
Agree about taking a breather to celebrate. I recall watching a movie years ago featuring galley slaves being ordered to row at “ramming speed.” While there is always more to do, it seems that perpetually proceeding at ramming speed will end in exhaustion and despair. Rest oars; take five, then, back at it.
I agree with your entire post…We should also keep Trump in the rear view window…meaning keep tabs on, but that’s about it.