Why Progressives Have Ignored Deaths Like Eric Garner’s For Years

A demonstrator holds a sign bearing the likeness of Eric Garner and Michael Brown before a march to protest the death of Garner, Saturday, Aug. 23, 2014, in the Staten Island borough of New York. The city medical exa... A demonstrator holds a sign bearing the likeness of Eric Garner and Michael Brown before a march to protest the death of Garner, Saturday, Aug. 23, 2014, in the Staten Island borough of New York. The city medical examiner ruled that Garner, 43, died as a result of a police chokehold during an attempted arrest. The march was led by the Rev. Al Sharpton's National Action Network. (AP Photo/John Minchillo) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

One of the cars parked on the streets near my house in Washington, D.C. has a magnet on the side reading: “Stop killing our black men. Jesus loves them and we need them.” This has been a terrible year for police brutality against African-Americans.

Except it hasn’t. Because before Eric Garner and Michael Brown, there was Kimani Gray. And Kendrec McDade. And before that Rodney King. And so many others. That magnet has been on that car in my neighborhood for years—as long as I’ve lived here. More African-Americans will be killed by American police officers before it is removed.

African-American activists have pointed this out repeatedly during the heated coverage of events in Ferguson and now New York City. The protests have never been about one incident. They’ve never been about one particular tragic death. These are protests against unceasing, unaccountable violence over many years. These are protests responding to a systemic failure that has roots as deep and as old as American chattel slavery.

Which is another way of saying that this wave of public attention—would that it were “public outcry”—is really a response to a failure of the American criminal justice system. And in a country like ours, failures in meting out justice are really failures of the broader American political experiment.

Sadly, this is why police violence against African-Americans has been so pervasive for so long without attracting much attention from white conservatives or progressives. To acknowledge that American police routinely brutalize African-Americans and their communities would be to admit that the United States has failed—is failing—at some of its core promises. For if our police behave so and our systems of judicial oversight are toothless to hold them accountable, that would mean that equality before the law is a mirage.

These are uncomfortable truths to face. And they are more damning than more quotidian forms of systemic racism. It is one thing to disproportionately assign African-American children to ineffective, under-resourced schools. It is quite another to kill African-American men without ever facing a trial (let alone a conviction).

White conservatives and progressives alike have been reticent to face the steady tragedy of police violence against African-Americans in the United States. Which is sadly consistent for conservatism, but a catastrophic failure by white progressives.

Start with the easier one. Here’s a general view of the spirit animating conservativism (borrowed from British philosopher Michael Oakeshott): every change, every reform, every novel idea represents the potential for gain and improvement. But it also represents a certain loss of familiarity. In general, conservatives resist changes because they fear losing elements of life and behavior with which they are comfortable in exchange for the uncertainty of reforms. A cynic might note that this often means conservatism is driven by the fear of losing familiar privileges and advantages.

But one of the most familiar elements of American life is our meritocracy mythology. We want badly to believe in the fairness of our markets in allocating resources to the hardworking and the justice of the legal procedures we use to allocate guilt and innocence. To admit that African-Americans are treated horribly by these systems—and have been for years—is to threaten a cherished and familiar aspect of conservatives’ national self-image. So they avoid facing that at all costs.

What about progressives? Oddly enough, something similar is going on. To be an American progressive—going back a century to Herbert Croly and John Dewey—is to believe that the United States’ institutions can be made better to fit American ideals. To admit that something can be improved, of course, is to admit that it has fallen short. Which is why progressives have always led American fights against racial injustice.

But since progressivism has always been about redeeming the American experiment, it can also be blind to how tightly our ugliest national sins are interwoven with our national institutions. The late progressive philosopher Richard Rorty opened Achieving Our Country with this line: “National pride is to countries what self-respect is to individuals: a necessary condition for self-improvement.” Notwithstanding conservative efforts to define progressivism in opposition to the United States’ history and identity, most progressives see the United States as a political experiment worth improving.

Which is to say that white progressives, too, are prone to overlooking the ways that American racism is comprehensive and systemic. To admit that the problem of police violence is deeply embedded in who we are as a nation is to face the possibility that earlier progress was vastly insufficient in solving the problem. Worse still, it may indicate that the project of becoming a better America is itself flawed. African-Americans certainly have reason to doubt that white Americans are ready to embark on meaningful reforms.

Perhaps white progressives have been so slow to make inequitable, violent policing of African-American communities a priority because they’ve struggled to accept that things could really be as bad as all that. And they’ve been loath to realize that this violence is symptomatic of enormous systemic injustice. But if they cannot see it now, then perhaps their radical leftist critics have been correct all along—perhaps real justice requires overhauling the whole American system.

“Feelings of intense shame or of glowing pride,” Rorty wrote, “[are] necessary if political deliberation is to be imaginative and productive.” Yesterday in New York, and for months in Ferguson, Americans have found ample reasons for shame. It remains to be seen whether we—especially American progressives—will use it as a spark for moving the United States closer to the country we believe ourselves to be.

Conor P. Williams, PhD is a Senior Researcher in New America’s Early Education Initiative. Follow him on Twitter @conorpwilliams. Follow him on Facebook.

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for anniew anniew says:

    Good articIe, I admit, sadly, to being one of the progressives that is shocked this is happening and the blatant racism being exhibited by defenders of the police actions. Maybe it has been willful ignorance but it really can no longer be ignored, I hope a tipping point has been reached.

  2. Sadly Liberal/Progressive people have hidden their heads in the sand unless they’ve been confronted in their own experiences by the brutality of the police. We cannot allow this kind of systemic and institutional brutality to continue unabated. America must face its demons and the demon of racism and the institutionalized nature of this racism has to be changed and we must all confront our part in these racist policies.

  3. Avatar for romath romath says:

    “Progressives” haven’t hidden their heads in the sand. Rather, so-called Progressives are largely just white middle class liberals playing with Marxist terms here and there. And as such, unless some movement pops up that captures their attention for a moment, they are just like any other white liberal. That is, there isn’t and hasn’t been anything historically progressive about the best of them for a good 100 years, since both Progressives and “revolutionary” socialists jumped ship and openly supported their own imperialist governments in WWI. Since then, what’s called progressives have just been anti-communist liberals, trying to argue that one can use the capitalist state to fundamentally reform society, while actively working to head off anything more radical.

  4. Avatar for 1972gd 1972gd says:

    “Sadly Liberal/Progressive people have hidden their heads in the sand unless they’ve been confronted in their own experiences by the brutality of the police.”

    I disagree with that - if you’ve been hiding your head in the sand regarding police brutality, especially towards African-American men, or regarding the entire range of social- and economic-justice issues, you really shouldn’t be calling yourself a progressive.

    Notably, this article doesn’t offer a single call to action, not a single solution. And I don’t really have any myself. I’m not in a position to put my life on hold, close up shop and join the protests in Ferguson, or NYC, or anywhere else. So what course of action open to me have I been hiding from? Signing some online petition?

    Almost every person in this country is struggling just to maintain what they have. According to UC Davis researcher Gregory Clark, upward mobility in the U.S. is no greater than upward mobility in medieval England. Medieval England. And those economic issues don’t take in to consideration the other issues progressives presumably concern themselves with, such as global warming, mass extinction, etc. It’s overwhelming, and I will openly admit to feeling a sense of futility. And that futility, and resignation, is compounded by facts such as 60% of the eligible voters in Ferguson couldn’t be bothered to vote in 2014. Again, just what is it I should be doing, especially when so many of the people so directly involved don’t seem to care.

    The author also seems to suggest that social justice is somehow a closed system, where there is only so much justice to go around, and that white progressives seem to fear that increased social justice for African Americans bears some sort of cost for progressive whites. It doesn’t.

  5. Avatar for chammy chammy says:

    Sadly most white people have hidden their heads in the sand - not just progressives. This is not a black issue - this is a HUMANE issue and we all need to show our outrage as do prominent leaders. White people need to speak out and speak loud.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

47 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for anniew Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for sooner Avatar for bmcchgo Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for romath Avatar for micaiah Avatar for chammy Avatar for tcinla Avatar for turdburgler Avatar for sandyh Avatar for 1972gd Avatar for carlosfiance Avatar for cliffhendroval Avatar for sniffit Avatar for jjrothery Avatar for eric_jaffa Avatar for darcy Avatar for martinheldt Avatar for feljones Avatar for seedoubleyou Avatar for seehowtheyrun

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: