Kate goes deeper on the new definition of “eve” the Court promulgated to help Republicans hold the House next year. (I don’t think it’ll be enough, but that’s another matter.) They take a principle that has some logic in extreme cases: there needs to be some balance between the merits of a case and potential disruption to an election. But given that we have House elections every two years, one year out cannot be the “eve” of an election. In any case, it’s more evidence of what we already know: we’re dealing with a corrupt Court at war with the Constitution. They do what they need to do to get the result they want. Read Kate.
LATEST
Where Things Stand
Kelly Says He’ll Fight Hegseth Retribution As Show Of Force For Free Speech
01.05.26 | 6:37 pm
Morning Memo
Trump’s Venezuela Attack Is a Uniquely Dangerous Threat to the Constitutional Order
01.05.26 | 10:08 am
News
Top DOJ Official Shut Down Enforcement Against Crypto Companies While Holding More Than $150,000 in Crypto Investments
01.04.26 | 9:00 am
News
Rural Health Fund Awarded To All 50 States, But Trump Admin Can Still ‘Claw Back’ Cash
01.03.26 | 7:00 am