McCarthy Downplays Trump’s Hush Money Payments: It Was ‘Personal Money,’ ‘Seven Years Ago’

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 03: U.S. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) reacts as Representatives cast their votes for Speaker of the House on the first day of the 118th Congress in the House Chamber of the U.S... WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 03: U.S. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) reacts as Representatives cast their votes for Speaker of the House on the first day of the 118th Congress in the House Chamber of the U.S. Capitol Building on January 03, 2023 in Washington, DC. Today members of the 118th Congress will be sworn-in and the House of Representatives will elect a new Speaker of the House. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) tried to downplay the Manhattan DA’s case against former president Donald Trump, regarding hush money payments to a porn star he was allegedly involved with, on Tuesday as simply an investigation into what the former president did with his “personal money.”

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office has been investigating Trump for his involvement in a $130,000 payment to porn star Stormy Daniels in 2016 to prevent her from discussing their alleged affair. Trump told his supporters over the weekend that he believes an indictment looms on his horizon.

“THE FAR & AWAY LEADING REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE & FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WILL BE ARRESTED ON TUESDAY OF NEXT WEEK,” he wrote on Truth Social early Saturday. “PROTEST, TAKE OUR NATION BACK!”

It remains unclear why Trump believes he will be indicted, and why he believed the indictment was coming on Tuesday; Trump claimed that the information came to him through “ILLEGAL LEAKS.” Bragg, who’s overseeing the case, hasn’t spoken publicly about his intentions or theory of the case, but his office recently offered Trump the chance to testify before a grand jury, signaling that he could soon be facing a criminal indictment.

House Speaker McCarthy has struggled to control the narrative ever since. “This was personal money,” he told reporters from a House GOP retreat on Tuesday. “This was seven years ago, statute of limitations.”

After Trump’s announcement, House GOPers scrambled to express outrage in support of the former president. House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan (R-OH) even demanded that Bragg provide sworn testimony about whether he’d communicated with the Justice Department about the case.

McCarthy himself has tried to skirt the line between following the party line and discouraging Trump’s more aggressive impulses. “Here we go again—an outrageous abuse of power by a radical DA who lets violent criminals walk as he pursues political vengeance against President Trump,” McCarthy tweeted over the weekend.

But he later tried to temper Trump’s call to action: “I don’t think people should protest this, no,” he told reporters. “No one should harm another on this.”

On Tuesday, he seems to have worked out his spin. “I think you know in your heart of hearts that this is just political,” he said. “And I think that’s what the rest of the country thinks. And we’re kind of tired of that.”

Latest News
52
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.

  2. Avatar for daled daled says:

    On Tuesday, he seems to have worked out his spin. “I think you know in your heart of hearts that this is just political,” he said. “And I think that’s what the rest of the country thinks. And we’re kind of tired of that.”

    He then added, “So, let’s move on to important topics like Hunter Biden’s laptop and maybe we’ll look at Benghazi again, because we never got the answers there that we wanted…we KNOW what the truth is…”

  3. WRONG
    NEW POLL: Whopping 65 Percent Think Trump Has Committed Crimes — Only A Third Think He’ll Ever Be Convicted (msn.com)

  4. Kevvy?

    It wasn’t “personal money,” you vacuous, flaccid choad. It was his company’s money. Rather than tap his own money pay Stormy to not tell the world about his weird, tiny member, he tapped that of his company so he could fraudulently turn a personal hush money payment that represented an unreported in-kind deduction into a deductible expense. To do this, he engaged in both structuring by means of an elaborate money laundering scheme, tax fraud and a felony violation of campaign finance laws.

  5. Also from seven years ago. What did Kevin McCarthy do to hush Renee Ellmers?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

46 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for daled Avatar for paulw Avatar for sysprog Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for epicurus Avatar for tigersharktoo Avatar for voreason Avatar for inversion Avatar for danny Avatar for tecmage Avatar for lastroth Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for hoagie Avatar for benthere Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for southerndem Avatar for caltg Avatar for tiowally Avatar for evave2 Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for mrbill30560 Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for john_adams

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: