Judge Throws Out Gohmert Lawsuit Seeking To Empower Pence To Overturn Election Results

WASHINGTON, DC – DECEMBER 11: U.S. House Judiciary Committee members Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) listens to opening statements during a markup hearing on the articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump in ... WASHINGTON, DC – DECEMBER 11: U.S. House Judiciary Committee members Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) listens to opening statements during a markup hearing on the articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump in the Longworth House Office Building on Capitol Hill December 11, 2019 in Washington, DC. The articles of impeachment charge Trump with abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. House Democrats claim that Trump posed a "clear and present danger" to national security and the 2020 election in his dealings with Ukraine over the past year. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A federal judge in Texas on Friday tossed out a lawsuit by Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) that sought to overturn the results of the presidential election won by Democrat Joe Biden.

U.S. District Judge Jeremy Kernodle issued an order dismissing the case after finding Gohmert’s alleged injury “far too uncertain to support standing.”

The decision by the Trump-appointed judge comes after Gohmert and a group of President Donald Trump’s allies argued that a vice president has the power to decide who wins a presidential election, regardless of the results.

The judge criticized Gohmert’s efforts at mounting “speculative” scenarios that presupposed “what the Vice President will do on January 6, which electoral votes the Vice President will count or reject from contested states, whether a Representative and a Senator will object under Section 15 of the Electoral Count Act, how each member of the House and Senate will vote on any such objections, and how each state delegation in the House would potentially vote under the Twelfth Amendment absent a majority electoral vote.”

“All that makes Congressman Gohmert’s alleged injury far too uncertain to support standing,” Kernodle wrote.

The Friday filing by Gohmert’s lawyers accused the government of trying to “hide behind procedural arguments,” after the Justice Department requested that the lawsuit be thrown out and indicated that Pence was an ill-suited target for the effort.

Gohmert claimed the vice president has the power to effectively pick the next president during the formal recording of electoral college votes by Congress in a joint session next week.

The filing to ultimately endow Pence the power to overturn the will of the people, asserted that the way Congress certifies presidential elections is unconstitutional. It suggested that Pence “may count elector votes certified by a state’s executive, or he can prefer a competing slate of duly qualified electors. He may ignore all electors from a certain state. That is the power bestowed upon him by the Constitution.”

In addition to the effort from the Justice Department to toss out the farfetched lawsuit, lawyers for the House of Representatives had also asked the judge to reject the Gohmert suit, saying it would “authorize the Vice President to ignore the will of the Nation’s voters.”

Read Judge Kernodle’s full order of dismissal below:

Latest News
306
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. A hard slap to the face heard nationwide…

  2. They’re suing Pence in order to establish that Pence has some extraordinary, heretofore unknown powers. What could possibly go wrong?

    We’ve also now determined that being butt-hurt by the results of an election is not sufficient to confer standing. Who knew?

  3. Gohmert continues and he knows this goes nowhere.

    Judge rules “no standing” in my lawsuit to toss fraudulent Biden electors. If I don’t have standing, no one does. When no one ever has standing, what good is a court system? My response on @Newsmax below #SaveTheRepublic #StopTheSteal https://t.co/HLQCM6S5CE

    — Louie Gohmert (@replouiegohmert) January 2, 2021

    For those asking why federal courts keep tossing election suits for lack of “standing,” rather than because the claims lack merit, they don’t have a choice.#SCOTUS doctrine *requires* federal courts to decide whether plaintiffs have standing *before* they can reach the merits.

    — Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) January 2, 2021
  4. The judge didn’t make a finding on the merits of Gohmert’s allegations. Judge Jeremy Kernodle, a Trump appointee in the Eastern District of Texas ruled that Gohmert and the Arizona electors who joined with him in the suit did not have standing to sue.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

300 more replies

Participants

Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for eldonlazar Avatar for cervantes Avatar for george_spiggott Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for thebigragu Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for lastroth Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for pine Avatar for pshah Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for docd Avatar for misterneutron Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for dominic Avatar for jouzu Avatar for zenicetus Avatar for rucleare Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for kovie

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: