Court Blocks Extended Deadline For WI Ballots As State Explodes With COVID Cases

MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN - AUGUST 11: A general view of a voting sign at the Charles Allis Art Museum polling station on August 11, 2020 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. (Photo by Stacy Revere/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has blocked a lower court ruling that would have pushed back Wisconsin’s voter registration deadline and required the state to count all absentee ballots postmarked by Election Day as long as they were received by November 9.

The voter registration deadline would have been pushed from October 14 to October 21. The Democratic National Committee and Wisconsin Democratic Party initially sued the state legislature and secretary of the elections commission back in March. The case is expected to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, though the DNC and Wisconsin Democratic Party did not immediately answer TPM’s questions about their next moves.

In a 2 to 1 decision, the court sided with the Republican-led legislature’s arguments that a federal court should not change the rules of an election so close to Election Day, and that political rather than judicial officials should get to decide when a pandemic justifies voting changes.

On the timing question, the judges faulted the lower court for waiting to issue a decision until September. And to that district judge’s concern that last-minute voters would struggle to have their vote counted, they said, essentially, not our problem.

“The problem that concerned the district judge, rather, was the difficulty that could be encountered by voters who do not plan ahead and wait until the last day that state law allows for certain steps,” they wrote. “Yet, as the Supreme Court observed last April in this very case, voters who wait until the last minute face problems with or without a pandemic.”

The dissenting member of the panel, Judge Ilana Rovner, retorted with a scorching opinion clocking in at more than three times the length of the majority’s.

“The inevitable result of the court’s decision today will be that many thousands of Wisconsin citizens will lose their right to vote despite doing everything they reasonably can to exercise it,” wrote Rovner, a George H.W. Bush appointee. “This is a travesty.”

She took particular aim at the majority’s assertion that the changes would be put into place too near to Election Day, and that the plaintiffs had had all pandemic long to wrangle the changes into place.

“The Covid-19 pandemic is no longer new but neither is it a static phenomenon; infection rates have ebbed and surged in multiple waves around the country and it is only now that Wisconsin is facing crisis-level conditions,” she wrote.

Crisis-level is no exaggeration. Wisconsin has become a raging hotspot, its cases jumping by 50 percent in the past two weeks, with 33,403 new infections. Governor Tony Evers (D) has been forced to activate a field hospital at fairgrounds near Milwaukee, as the state’s hospital system has been pushed to the brink of collapse from the influx in cases. The number of patients hospitalized currently — 873, according to the COVID Tracking Project — is the highest Wisconsin has seen during the whole pandemic.

Experts have attributed the spike to the reopening of K-12 schools, and lack of adherence to best practices like mask-wearing. Evers, while trying to fend off challenges from the Republican legislature, has enacted through his health secretary a ban on indoor gatherings of more than 10 people.

Nothing in the case law, Rovner argued, “forecloses modifications of the kind the district court ordered in the worsening circumstances that confront Wisconsin as the election draws nigh.”

“We cannot turn a blind eye to the present circumstances and treat this as an ordinary election,” she concluded. “Nor can we blindly defer to a state legislature that sits on its hands while a pandemic rages.”

“Good luck and G-d bless, Wisconsin. You are going to need it.”

Read the decision here:

Latest News
41
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Republican-led legislature’s arguments that a federal court should not change the rules of an election so close to Election Day

    This is going to play out very well … if you want to steal an election.

  2. They not only want to steal the election, if they can flip a few seats they will have a veto proof majority.

    “Good luck and G-d bless, Wisconsin. You are going to need it.”

    Yeah, thanks for the assist, judges.

    ETA: I do understand the whole bit with the legislature sitting on their asses and not doing this, but hey, why should they, right? And even if they had agreed, it would have ended up getting denied at the Supreme level again, yada yada. BS

  3. It is just uphill all of the fucking way, isn’t it?

    This is no way to run a country, but that being said, we are ready for any damned thing you want to throw at us. We are going to vote this asshole out like marauding zombie hordes pouring over the walls of a makeshift fortress. And we are going to take a lot of his Republican friends with him.

  4. The Anti-Democratic Party can’t win, if people vote. Having sacrificed every shred of decency to their corporate overlords, they have no other card to play besides voter suppression.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

35 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for sysprog Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for cervantes Avatar for sniffit Avatar for itsjibba Avatar for arrendis Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for schmed Avatar for darrtown Avatar for tribalogical Avatar for noonm Avatar for birdford Avatar for tiowally Avatar for jmacaz Avatar for woland66 Avatar for skeptical Avatar for godwit Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for Volvo_Birkenstock Avatar for LeeHarveyGriswold Avatar for Scoutmom Avatar for El_Grupo Avatar for geographyjones

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: