John Conyers, Longest-Serving Black Member Of Congress, Passes Away At 90

on September 18, 2015 in Washington, DC.
Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) speaks at a session during the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation's 45th annual legislative conference September 18, 2015. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Former Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) passed away at the age of 90 on Sunday.

The Detroit police confirmed that Conyers had died of natural causes.

Conyers was in office for 52 years, making him the longest-serving African-American in Congress. He was elected in 1965 and continued to serve up until 2017, when he resigned in wake of several accusations of sexual misconduct against him.

“I recognize that in this present environment, due process will not be afforded to me,” he said in a statement at the time.

Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) won his seat in the 2018 midterms.

Latest News
15
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. From John’s statement when he was essentially ejected:

    “I’ve been a champion of justice for the oppressed and the disenfranchised. I never wavered in my commitment to justice and democracy. I am proud to have been part of that rich history.”

    Worth remembering.

    But the allegations against him were not anonymous or vague and, like Minority Leader at the time, Nancy Pelosi, I found the allegations serious and credible.

    We all have to take the exit at some point. I remember the good things John Conyers did so I wish his exit could have been cleaner.

    And I hope the women he mistreated are doing well in spite of it.

  2. Avatar for revjim revjim says:

    I agree with your statement. Representative Conyers did many good things in his life and during his tenure. But in the end the accusations did seem valid. I think your comment was very well phrased and I will not try to add to it further.

  3. Avatar for paulw paulw says:

    Everyone has a mix of good and bad in them. Even if we end up deciding a person isn’t fit for a particular job and/or deserves censure, that doesn’t necessarily devalue the things they accomplished. (Yeah, that treads perilously close to the Cyrus argument, but I think there’s still a big difference.)

  4. As a parent of two wonderful daughters, I co-sign.

  5. I look at a sexual harassment story like Jon Conyers’ and it’s becoming more and more believable to me that Al Franken was railroaded by allegations that were either flimsy or flat out lies. Conyers’ allegations are a clear example of sexual harassment where a person in power was trying to abuse his authority over his subordinates and did things that were surely wrong like coming out of a shower with his employee nearby. None of Franken’s staff ever accused him of anything and Franken’s allegations have too many things that don’t add up such as details not passing scrutiny, accusers that were talking to each other before talking to reporters, and reporters not trying to find more sources before publishing their stories. All 9 of the allegations were published individually with the accuser and a few friends or family members claiming they were told about the incident afterwards, but never witnessed it.

    After her CNN accusation went public where she claimed Franken cupped her breast, Stephanie Kemplin subsequently claimed that she thought she smelled alcohol on Franken’s breath when it happened. That’s complete BS for a few reasons.

    1. Franken’s wife Franni had alcohol dependency problems for years and finally got completely clean in 2008. Franken supported her a lot during that time and is unlikely to betray that trust. He even co-wrote a movie based on that in 1994 called “When a Man Loves a Woman”.
    2. The incident took place in Kuwait which has a total ban on alcohol. You can get arrested if they see you with a bottle. Another 2003 USO show group got cancelled because they brought in alcohol.
    3. Kemplin was Military Police, she knew about the ban and would have confiscated any alcohol.

    The reporters also failed to follow up with people who witnessed the incidents and just believed the accusers. Zack Roth at Huff Post stated his accuser was a friend that he’s known for years which shows a possible confirmation bias and he never stated he corroborated the account with the two friends of the accuser who were there at the time.

    I just wish other journalists would actually look over all of the claims to give them proper scrutiny instead of just assuming Franken is guilty because he had 9 accusations. 9 allegations doesn’t mean they are 9 credible allegations.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

9 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for paulw Avatar for blandsten Avatar for cervantes Avatar for voreason Avatar for jimtoday Avatar for rick Avatar for wassmuss Avatar for burningquestions Avatar for revjim Avatar for swampsofjersey

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Deputy Editor for News:
Deputy Editor for Audience and Strategy:
Editor-at-Large:
Contributing Editor:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher & Digital Producer:
Senior Developer:
Senior Designer: