WH Refuses Dems’ Request For Info On Trump’s Talks With Putin

WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 11 : White House counsel Pat Cipollone, and Director of the Office of Management and Budget Mick Mulvaney, listen as President Donald J. Trump and Vice President Mike Pence meet with House M... WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 11 : White House counsel Pat Cipollone, and Director of the Office of Management and Budget Mick Mulvaney, listen as President Donald J. Trump and Vice President Mike Pence meet with House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., during a meeting in the Oval Office of White House on Tuesday, Dec. 11, 2018 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The White House has rejected House Democrats’ request for information on President Donald Trump’s communications with Russian President Vladimir Putin, citing executive authority.

“The President must be free to engage in discussions with foreign leaders without fear that those communications will be disclosed and used as fodder for partisan political purposes,” White House counsel Pat Cipollone (pictured above, left) wrote to the chairmen of the House Committees on Intelligence, Foreign Affairs and Oversight. CNN obtained the letter.

“And foreign leaders must be assured of this as well,” Cipollone added.

The chairmen, Reps. Adam Schiff (D-CA), Eliot Engel (D-NY) and Elijah Cummings (D-MD), wrote to the White House earlier this month requesting the communications, following up on a similar request from February that went without response.

Referring to reports that Trump had seized a translator’s notes following a meeting with Putin, the chairmen also asked that the translators be made available for interviews.

Per CNN, Cipollone added:

“Presidents from all political parties have determined that the law does not require the Executive Branch to provide Congress with documents relating to confidential diplomatic communications between the President and foreign leaders … No foreign leader would engage in private conversations with the President, or the President’s senior advisors, if such conversations were subject to public disclosure (or disclosure to committees of Congress).

[…]

“It appears that the practice of the Committees has been to request information that the Committees have no legal entitlement to receive and then to unfairly criticize the White House for simply adhering to consistent bipartisan past practice in its response.” 

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Not my area of expertise, so if there’s anyone who is more familiar than me, please chime in.

    Having said that, Trump is likely to be right on this one. Would we have wanted FDR’s communications with Churchill before Pearl Harbor to be open to isolationists in Congress? No.

    However, the protected nature of such communications is just one more reason why Trump’s mental disintegration (forget about his absolute lack of integrity) makes him unfit for office.

  2. Even if he’s right, demand it and force them to deny it so it makes it look like he’s got something terrible to hide.

    Which he does.

  3. I am shocked.

    Shocked, I say!

  4. Any info they did provide congress would be a pack of lies anyway, and it would be difficult to dispute those lies.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

47 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for clemmers Avatar for oscarhomolka Avatar for george_spiggott Avatar for inversion Avatar for jkrogman Avatar for cd Avatar for bboerner Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for darrtown Avatar for clauscph Avatar for bodie1 Avatar for jtx Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for jmacaz Avatar for maximus Avatar for realskeptic Avatar for moonmac Avatar for carolson Avatar for bcgister Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for emiliano4

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: