35 Million Voter Records From 19 States Offered For Sale On Dark Web Forum

Voters cast their ballots at the Sutton town hall in the US presidential election November 8, 2016 in Sutton, New Hampshire. Eager voters crowded into polling stations to choose a new US president Tuesday after a wi... Voters cast their ballots at the Sutton town hall in the US presidential election November 8, 2016 in Sutton, New Hampshire. Eager voters crowded into polling stations to choose a new US president Tuesday after a wild and bitter contest between the billionaire populist Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, the Democrat seeking to become the first woman to win the White House. / AFP / Ryan McBride (Photo credit should read RYAN MCBRIDE/AFP/Getty Images) MORE LESS

Security researchers say an estimated 35 million voter records from 19 U.S. states have been offered for sale on a dark web online forum.

The researchers said Monday the offering does not mean voter databases have been breached. The records could have been stolen from resellers who buy voter data from states for use by campaigns and get-out-the-vote efforts.

Policies vary by state on who can buy such records, which typically include phone numbers and addresses, sometimes voting histories. Commercial use and publication are generally prohibited.

Andrei Barysevich of Recorded Future says his company was among those that discovered the offerings.

Barysevich says state-backed hackers set on election meddling wouldn’t be selling such data — but rather looking to buy it.

Experts say the main risk is of identity theft.

13
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Can we get an exclusive? If so, have the Justice Department buy them.

  2. Avatar for nemo nemo says:

    OK, we know that the GOP has substantively and strategically opened the door to hackers–whether domestic or foreign–to intervene in this election, as in the last. That is a fact. Should someone go through the door and produce a narrow and anomalous electoral victory for the GOP, nobody will be surprised. For the first time in living memory, we’ll be voting in an election where we cannot be certain of the integrity of the results. That is the state of our democracy. So what do we do? There are few choices, at this point. Our electeds tried to get funding for voting security but failed. That is no surprise. We have been outmaneuvered and outfought in congress for years. It will come down the Dem grassroots, again, to drive this issue. But what can we do?

    1. Campaign and vote on the footing that all will be well. Focus on that for now.
    2. If we win, make electoral security a condition of any spending approvals. We can’t go into 2020 with another de facto Trump-Russia alliance, and we can’t ignore the threat of domestic extremists flipping vote tallies either. As matters stand, any dude with basic knowhow can alter vote tallies in certain states, invisibly, in a matter of minutes.
    3. If we lose the House, we refuse to accept the legitimacy of the result. I’m certainly not going to sit back, in a year of unprecedented Democratic fervor and presidential disapproval ratings, and proceed on the footing that the gangster party in control acted in good faith and gee whiz I guess we blew it again. Nope. We will force a constitutional crisis, and we will torch any Dems who don’t have the guts to act with proportionate courage. A constitutional crisis will in any case be upon us, since Mueller will be fired, with GOP support.

    Update: On Dems being outmaneuvered, it has happened again. Remember how Chuckie agreed to wave through another batch of extremist judicial appointments? To enable Democrats to campaign in the resulting recess? Any idiot could have told him (and some of us did) that he’d been played again by McConnell. Well, now this:

  3. “…such records, which typically include phone numbers and addresses, sometimes voting histories.”

    Probably best to clarify that what is meant by “voting history” here, is the record of which elections the voter cast a vote, not of how they voted. Obviously, the ballot is secret, so no record is possible of how you vote, but the fact of a registered voter having voted or failed to vote in any given election is a matter of at least semi-public record.

    These records are how we know that voter ID fraud is not an issue. We can go back and look at the record of who voted in any given election and see that there is no pattern of dead people voting in numbers anywhere near enough to change an election result. The record of who voted and who didn’t has to remain at least semi-public because it is one of our main safeguards against fraudulent elections. It is far more powerful than making voters show ID, and makes that measure completely unnecessary as an actual legitimate safeguard. Voter ID is voter suppression, pure and simple.

  4. Avatar for korvu korvu says:

    Kobach did it; the guy should be in chains pounding on rocks.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

7 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for kenneth_thomas Avatar for ghost Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for bluinmaine Avatar for gtomkins Avatar for bonvivant Avatar for korvu Avatar for gr Avatar for nemo Avatar for tiowally

Continue Discussion