Total Number Of US Victims In Unexplained Cuba Attacks Rises To 24

This image provided by Chris Allen shows the view in Havana, Cuba, from his hotel room - room 1414 - at Hotel Capri in April 2014. Allen’s phone started buzzing as word broke of invisible attacks hitting a U.S. gov... This image provided by Chris Allen shows the view in Havana, Cuba, from his hotel room - room 1414 - at Hotel Capri in April 2014. Allen’s phone started buzzing as word broke of invisible attacks hitting a U.S. government worker at Havana’s Hotel Capri. Allen’s friends and family had heard an eerily similar story from him before. The tourist from South Carolina had cut short his trip to Cuba two years earlier after numbness spread through all four of his limbs, just minutes after he climbed into bed at the same hotel. Those weren’t the only parallels in Allen’s recounting, which put him in a growing list of Americans with no government connections, asking the same alarming but unanswerable question: Were we victims, too? (Chris Allen via AP) MORE LESS

WASHINGTON (AP) — The United States says two more government workers are confirmed victims in the unexplained Cuba attacks.

The State Department is increasing the official tally from 22 to 24. But State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert says the new victims “do not reflect new attacks.” She says the additional victims were confirmed following medical evaluations of workers attacked earlier in the year.

Nauert says the most recent attack is still believed to have been near the end of August. A U.S. official told The Associated Press previously that attack occurred Aug. 21. The official wasn’t authorized to disclose the exact date and requested anonymity.

The State Department says it can’t rule out “additional new cases.”

The attacks started last year and affected American diplomats, intelligence officials and their spouses in Havana.

10
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. “Unexplained Cuba Attacks”? More like a mass psycho/sociogenic illness until more facts come to light.

  2. Yeah. This very short article manages to use “attack” in one form or another SIX TIMES – not counting the headline!

    When and how was it established that these “occurrences” are “attacks”?

    What kind of journalism is this supposed to be?

  3. Is there any independent confirmation of these “victims”? All i’ve heard (IANAJournalist) are reports from state department spokespeople - no other source, no “victim” directly. I hate conspiracy speculation like that, but an independent source would be nice…

  4. If they are ¨unexplained¨ cases, how do does the author know they´re ¨attacks¨?

  5. Hey Josh, stop doing Trump’s anti-Cuba propaganda for him. Nothing about these “attacks” has ever been independent confirmed. Just ask Canada. Does TPM believe Trump about climate change and “fake” news too?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

4 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for kenr Avatar for ralph_novy Avatar for carlosfiance Avatar for proudatheist Avatar for isaacb Avatar for leaddreamer Avatar for cantonjester Avatar for mhcypher

Continue Discussion