AP Sources: CEO Of Democratic National Committee Resigns

Democratic National Committee (DNC) CEO Amy Dacey and other representatives considering where to host the 2016 convention, get cheesesteaks at Pat's King of Steaks in Philadelphia on Wednesday, Aug. 13, 2014. Philade... Democratic National Committee (DNC) CEO Amy Dacey and other representatives considering where to host the 2016 convention, get cheesesteaks at Pat's King of Steaks in Philadelphia on Wednesday, Aug. 13, 2014. Philadelphia is one of five cities bidding to host the convention along with Birmingham, Ala; Columbus, Ohio; the Brooklyn borough of New York, and Phoenix. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke) MORE LESS

WASHINGTON (AP) — The chief executive of the Democratic National Committee has resigned in the wake of an email hack that embarrassed the party on the eve of its convention.

That’s according to three Democratic strategists familiar with Amy Dacey’s decision to leave her job. The people spoke on condition of anonymity, because they were not authorized to discuss it publicly.

The Democrats say other personnel moves at the party are also expected Tuesday.

The content of the hacked emails exposed an apparent lack of neutrality in the primary race between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, with party officials disparaging Sanders.

Party chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz resigned her position before the convention began. After being booed at a later appearance in Philadelphia, she chose not to speak from the convention stage.

Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

29
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. “The content of the hacked emails exposed an apparent lack of neutrality in the primary race between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, with party officials disparaging Sanders.”

    But nothing actually done to impact the nomination.

  2. Avatar for henk henk says:

    Not that we know of anyway, of course we can all agree that the debate schedule was a tad “odd” and suggesting that Bernie’s Jewishness be made an issue may seem a bit over the top to some, but as you say nothing quantifiable has been proven, so what the heck, shouldn’t we just leave all these people in place? Sure neutrality is laudable goal, but come on lets be adult, you can’t prove anything, people make mistakes and really who is truly ever neutral on any thing. As Hillary’s supporters said way back in 2008: PUMA “Party Unity My Ass!”

  3. I was a Bernie voter, but the emails sure looked to me like the typical BS people of any organization fire back and forth but don’t really do anything about. If that’s the worst stuff there, the DNC is a pretty tight ship. I thought Bernie had two legit complaints WRT the DNC: 1) DWS locking him out of the database, and 2) the debate schedule-- and the DNC responded to both of these.

    In short, it wasn’t elegant, but the system worked.

    I’m not sure the resignation was required, but it shows that the DNC cares about the appearance of propriety, and is therefore probably a good move.

  4. There was nothing there saying Bernie’s Jewishness be MADE an issue. The question was whether in certain areas could his Jewishness BE an issue. Those are two totally different things.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

23 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for ajm Avatar for ruffian Avatar for dcprogress Avatar for kendyzdad Avatar for pac Avatar for mymy Avatar for commentingtoo Avatar for conundrum Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for alteran Avatar for henk Avatar for professorpoopypants Avatar for cologirl

Continue Discussion