Pro-EU Protesters March In London, Demand New Vote On Brexit

Vince Cable MP, Pro-EU campaigner Gina Miller, Tony Robinson and Caroline Lucas MP join with crowds taking part in the People's Vote march for a second EU referendum at Trafalgar Square in central London. PRESS ASSOCIATION Photo. Picture date: Saturday June 23, 2018. See PA story POLITICS Brexit. Photo credit should read: John Stillwell/PA Wire
From centre carrying banner, British lawmaker Vince Cable, Pro-EU campaigners Gina Miller, Tony Robinson and lawmaker Caroline Lucas join crowds taking part in the People's Vote march for a second EU referendum, at ... From centre carrying banner, British lawmaker Vince Cable, Pro-EU campaigners Gina Miller, Tony Robinson and lawmaker Caroline Lucas join crowds taking part in the People's Vote march for a second EU referendum, at Trafalgar Square in central London, Saturday June 23, 2018. Leading Brexit supporters are talking tough, and opponents are taking to the streets, on the second anniversary of Britain's vote to leave the European Union. Saturday marks two years since a June 23, 2016 referendum resulted in a decision to quit the 28-nation EU. (John Stillwell/PA via AP) MORE LESS

LONDON (AP) — Tens of thousands of anti-Brexit protesters marched Saturday in London to demand a new referendum on leaving the European Union, as a divided Britain marked the second anniversary of its vote to quit the bloc.

Leading Brexit supporters, meanwhile, warned the British government not to delay or water down the divorce from the 28-nation bloc. Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson said Prime Minister Theresa May must deliver the “full British Brexit” that voters were seeking.

Britain voted 52 percent to 48 percent on June 23, 2016 to quit the EU, and its official exit is slated for March 29, 2019. But the country — and its Conservative government — remain divided about what kind of economic relationship it wants with the EU.

Opponents of Brexit, many waving EU flags, marched through central London to Parliament on Saturday, calling for a referendum on whatever divorce deal is agreed between Britain and the EU.

The crowd numbered in the tens of thousands, with organizers estimating 100,000 people took part. Police did not give an official estimate. A rival pro-Brexit march, demanding that the U.K. not compromise with the EU, drew a far smaller crowd.

The People’s Vote campaign, which organized the march, argues that public opinion is turning against Brexit as the economic costs become clearer.

James McGrory, one of the organizers, said voters were “made all kinds of promises” during the Brexit referendum.

“But two years later, all we’ve got are broken promises, an economy that’s already feeling the strain of Brexit and a government paralyzed by internal divisions,” he said.

Protester Matthew Mann, a Briton who is married to a French woman and lives in The Netherlands, said he was “here to show what a European looks like.”

“I have lived and worked across Europe — it’s home,” he said.

The leaders of both Britain’s Conservatives and the opposition Labour Party oppose holding another Brexit referendum, though many members of both parties disagree. Smaller parties, including the Greens and the centrist Liberal Democrats, support having a new Brexit vote.

“Brexit is not a done deal. Brexit is not inevitable. Brexit can be stopped,” Liberal Democrat leader Vince Cable told the crowd.

The government is determined to see Brexit through but May’s Cabinet is split over how to proceed, with Brexit-backing ministers such as Johnson calling for a clean break so that Britain can strike new trade deals around the world. Others, including Treasury chief Philip Hammond, want to keep closely aligned to the bloc, Britain’s biggest trading partner.

In an article for The Sun newspaper, Johnson said May must not deliver a “half-hearted” Brexit, which he likened to a roll of toilet paper — “soft, yielding and seemingly infinitely long.”

International Trade Secretary Liam Fox told the BBC the EU needs to understand that Britain is willing to walk away from the Brexit talks without agreement if necessary, because “no deal would be better than a bad deal.”

Amid the uncertainty, EU leaders are growing frustrated with what they see as a lack of firm proposals from the U.K about future relations. A paper setting out the U.K. government position on future relations, due to be published this month, has been delayed until July because the Cabinet cannot agree on a united stance.

Many businesses warn that a failure to reach a free-trade agreement between Britain and the EU would be an economic disaster. European plane-maker Airbus warned Friday that it could leave Britain — where it employs about 14,000 people — if the country exits the EU without an agreement on future trading relations.

Katherine Bennett, the company’s senior vice president in the U.K., said “a no-deal Brexit would be catastrophic.”

49
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Given recent revelations about Russian meddling, you’d think a re-vote would would only be right.

  2. If they get a do-over, we get a do-over, too!

  3. I know, right? It was all a bad dream. All a bad—excuse me, something in my eye.

  4. It has been a long time coming. This Brexit vote is tainted. There was illegitimate foreign interference. The problem is that the UK suffers from political paralysis as Theresa May (who voted against Brexit) cynically adopted the pro-Brexit position to keep power as a majority of the Conservative party are pro-Brexit. On the left, the Labour Party is led by a far left socialist who might as well be a Russian agent. He is Brexit agnostic, but he’s really pro-Brexit because he has been unwilling to support the views of a majority of Labour’s voters (that there needs to be a new vote). The Liberal Democrats are not a strong enough political party to push a new vote. But it’s clear that a new vote is needed. May has to know that expecting a stronger US-UK partnership post-Brexit is not really an option when you have leaders like Donald Trump running things.

  5. Avatar for pshah pshah says:

    It would be easy to criticize Britain for locking themselves into a static situation, unable to move forward or backward on a critical issue, and led by people either without a spine or corrupted by Russian money. But then I realize, at least they’re not moving backwards and engaging in horrific sin like we are. At least they’re not led by a moral monster with grandiose ideas of becoming dictator for life.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

43 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for brooklyndweller Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for jackster Avatar for crackerjack Avatar for redacted Avatar for liberal Avatar for murgatroid Avatar for sonsofares Avatar for joelopines Avatar for tena Avatar for gusfabriani Avatar for khyber900 Avatar for canadachris Avatar for remy Avatar for socalista Avatar for pauldownard Avatar for toz Avatar for loss_mentality Avatar for dominic Avatar for evave2 Avatar for captain_america Avatar for angrychickadee

Continue Discussion