Priebus Asked FBI Official To Deny Trump/Russia Stories

Chairman of the Republican National Convention Reince Priebus addresses the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Fla., on Tuesday, Aug. 28, 2012. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — White House chief of staff Reince Priebus asked a top FBI official to dispute media reports that President Donald Trump’s campaign advisers were frequently in touch with Russian intelligence agents during the election, a White House official said late Thursday.

The official said Priebus’ request came after the FBI told the White House it believed a New York Times report last week describing those contacts was not accurate. As of Thursday, the FBI had not stated that position publicly and there was no indication it planned to.

The New York Times reported that U.S. agencies had intercepted phone calls last year between Russian intelligence officials and members of Trump’s 2016 campaign team.

Priebus’ discussion with FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe sparked outrage among some Democrats, who said he was violating policies intended to limit communications between the law enforcement agency and the White House on pending investigations.

“The White House is simply not permitted to pressure the FBI to make public statements about a pending investigation of the president and his advisers,” said Michigan Rep. John Conyers, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee.

A 2009 memo from then-Attorney General Eric Holder said the Justice Department is to advise the White House on pending criminal or civil investigations “only when it is important for the performance of the president’s duties and appropriate from a law enforcement perspective.” When communication has to occur, the memo said, it should involve only the highest-level officials from the White House and the Justice Department.

The White House official would not comment when asked if the administration was concerned about the appropriateness of Priebus’ communications with McCabe. The official was not authorized to disclose the matter publicly and insisted on anonymity.

The FBI would not say whether it had contacted the White House about the veracity of the Times report.

CNN first reported that Priebus had asked the FBI to weigh in on the matter.

Trump has been shadowed by questions about potential ties to Russia since winning the election. U.S. intelligence agencies have also concluded that Russia meddled in the campaign to help Trump defeat Democrat Hillary Clinton.

Last week, Trump fired national security adviser Michael Flynn because he misled Vice President Mike Pence and other White House officials about his contacts with the Russian ambassador to the U.S. Flynn, who was interviewed by the FBI about his contacts, is said to have talked with the ambassador multiple times during the transition, including about U.S. sanctions policy.

Still, Trump and his advisers have denied contacts with Russian officials during the election. Last week, Trump said “nobody that I know of” spoke with Russian intelligence agents during the campaign.

Priebus alluded to his contacts with the FBI over the weekend, telling Fox News that “the top levels of the intelligence community” have assured him that the allegations of campaign contacts with Russia were “not only grossly overstated, but also wrong.”

Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said Priebus’ comments opened the door for FBI Director James Comey to discuss the bureau’s investigation publicly.

“If the White House chief of staff can make public claims about the supposed conclusions of an FBI investigation, then Director Comey can come clean with the American people,” Wyden said.

Justin Shur, a former Justice Department public corruption prosecutor, said it was imperative that Justice Department investigations not be swayed by political considerations.

“As a general matter, investigations and prosecutions should be about gathering the facts and the evidence and applying the law,” Shur said.

During the campaign, Trump and other Republicans vigorously criticized a meeting between then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton, husband of Trump’s general election opponent. The meeting came as the FBI — which is overseen by the Justice Department — was investigating Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email address and personal internet server.

_

Asoociated Press writers Eric Tucker and Eileen Sullivan contributed to this report.

_

Follow Julie Pace at http://twitter.com/jpaceDC

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for pmm080 pmm080 says:

    Priebus actually tried to “influence” (bully) the FBI !
    Did Comey etc comply ??? As would be expected because of the past actions of the FBI and their buddy Trump ?

  2. Avatar for mantan mantan says:

    The White House official

    Certainly not Satan, er Bannon?

  3. Avatar for dave48 dave48 says:

    Isn’t this against the law? Does that even matter anymore?

  4. I remember the Nixon White House trying to get the CIA to stop he FBI from investigating the Watergate break in. It became the basis for the first impeachment count, obstruction of justice. History repeats itself, no doubt. First as tragedy, then as farce.

  5. Avatar for j.dave j.dave says:

    Wyden wants the FBI to “come clean.”

    Wyden knows what happened in last Friday’s Comey briefing.

    This could be promising!

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

260 more replies

Participants

Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for matthew1961 Avatar for jep07 Avatar for dave48 Avatar for mames5 Avatar for becca656 Avatar for turdburgler Avatar for randyabraham Avatar for stoy Avatar for mantan Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for uk_observer Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for clauscph Avatar for jeof Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for socalista Avatar for kumquat16 Avatar for clare Avatar for checkmate2016

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: