Oregon Standoff Sheds Light On Fringey ‘Constitutional Sheriffs’ Group

FILE - In this Aug. 19, 2015 file photo, Oregon Gov. Kate Brown hugs Grant County Sheriff Glenn Palmer as they enter a meeting with homeowners in Canyon City, Ore. The contrasting actions of two rural Oregon sheriffs... FILE - In this Aug. 19, 2015 file photo, Oregon Gov. Kate Brown hugs Grant County Sheriff Glenn Palmer as they enter a meeting with homeowners in Canyon City, Ore. The contrasting actions of two rural Oregon sheriffs during the recent armed standoff at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge were striking: one worked with federal officials to end the siege while another questioned the FBI’s authority and offered words of support for the ragtag group that seized property in the state’s high desert country. (Thomas Boyd /The Oregonian via AP, File) MAGS OUT; TV OUT; NO LOCAL INTERNET; THE MERCURY OUT; WILLAMETTE WEEK OUT; PAMPLIN MEDIA GROUP OUT; MANDATORY CREDIT MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

SPOKANE, Wash. (AP) — The actions of two rural Oregon sheriffs during an armed standoff at a national wildlife refuge were striking: one worked with federal officials to end the siege while the other questioned the FBI’s authority and offered words of support for the occupiers.

Sheriff Dave Ward of Harney County, where the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge is located, cooperated with federal and state police, urging standoff leader Ammon Bundy and his followers to stand down and respect the law.

Meanwhile in Grant County, immediately to the north, Sheriff Glenn Palmer called the occupiers “patriots.” When Bundy and others were arrested during a Jan. 26 traffic stop, they were on their way to his county. An Arizona rancher who police fatally shot when they say he reached for a gun shouted he was on his way to meet Palmer.

Palmer is a member of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, a group that bills itself as “the last line of defense” against a federal government they contend overreaches on gun control and other issues. They see sheriffs as the ultimate law enforcement authority in their dispute with the federal government over control of federal lands.

The group’s founder said they are recruiting people to run against sheriff’s that don’t support their cause and that the group’s website includes lists of county sheriffs and whether they need to be “recalled or replaced.”

Critics say the group’s views are far outside the mainstream. Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law Center, which for decades has advocated against groups it considers extremist, called the CSPOA “a remarkably radical organization, considering who their members are.”

“Many constitutional sheriffs believe they can pass a local law and forbid federal authorities from coming into a county,” he said. “That is patently false.’

Richard Mack, a former Arizona sheriff and CSPOA founder, said he didn’t support the occupation of the wildlife refuge, “but I understand the complete frustration people have in this country towards this government.” Mack said the group will work to defeat Ward in the November election.

Mack’s group, founded in 2011, claims more than 400 of the nation’s more than 3,000 county sheriffs support its positions, which hold that elected county sheriffs should oppose federal agents whose conduct appears to violate the U.S. Constitution.

The CSPOA is unequivocal about gun rights. It supports the right of criminals and the mentally ill to carry firearms and opposes gun registration or background checks.

In conservative Kootenai County, Idaho, popular sheriff Ben Wolfinger has drawn two opponents who support the concept of constitutional sheriffs. Tina Kunishige, one of the candidates, said sheriffs need to decide which laws are constitutional.

“I’m very comfortable with that,’ said Kunishige, who has no law enforcement experience. “I’ve studied the Constitution for a number of years.”

Wolfinger said he doesn’t need an outside group like the CSPOA to approve how he does his job. “I believe that the people I serve in Kootenai County will hold me accountable to do the job that they elected me for,” Wolfinger said.

Sheriffs who support the CSPOA have faced backlash.

Palmer, the sheriff who sided with the Oregon occupiers, has drawn an opponent in the November elections who criticized him for making his own interpretations of the Constitution.

And Palmer, who did not respond to interview requests from The Associated Press, is being investigated by the state for his actions during the Oregon standoff. If Palmer is found to have violated standards, he could lose his police certification.

The Oregon occupation started on Jan. 2 and ended Feb. 11 when the last holdouts surrendered to authorities. It began as a protest amid mounting tension over the case of local ranchers Dwight and Steven Hammond.

The Hammonds lit fires on federal land in 2001 and 2006 to protect their property from wildfires and invasive plants. The two were convicted three years ago and served time — the father three months, the son one year. But an appeals court ruled the sentences were too short under federal law, and a federal judge ordered them back to prison for about four years each.

Mack backs Palmer in the ongoing investigation into his actions.

“He’s an honorable man who has done nothing wrong.” Mack said.

Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News
44
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Someone in law enforcement that lets their prejudices influence their actions…why I never would have guessed…

  2. “Many constitutional sheriffs believe they can pass a local law and forbid federal authorities from coming into a county,”

    Loses Civil War…says “nuh uh, do-over” to reset everything and try again…

  3. Avatar for fgs fgs says:

    The Oregon judicial terrorists were trying to get into federal court, for a shot at having the whole BLM declared unconstitutional. It’s not clear whether the whackadoo sheriffs association were the instigators, or just hitched their wagons.

  4. Yep, I’m the law here abouts just so you know I am also above the law…you know I have extrajudicial powers. Powers that are valid only in my imagination but they are POWERS?!/)*

  5. They’re pretty strongly intertwined. The Bundy Bunch are only one head on that beast. There’s Ken Ivory’s group - an Americans for Prosperity-backed land grab bunch in Utah. There are individual landowners of the ‘donor class’ persuasion attempting to purchase judgeships in Montana, and the list goes on.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

38 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for fgs Avatar for overreach_this Avatar for jw1 Avatar for lochsabill Avatar for mollynyc Avatar for mikem42 Avatar for gtomkins Avatar for hychka Avatar for pshipkey Avatar for sniffit Avatar for donnyyoung Avatar for breakingdeadmen Avatar for boidster Avatar for fuzz Avatar for konnie Avatar for dickweed Avatar for reggid Avatar for beattycat Avatar for chiefkurtz Avatar for pmaroneyb Avatar for ljb860 Avatar for dwolf Avatar for canyoncountry

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: