Obama Will Ask SCOTUS To Hear Case Challenging His Immigration Plan

In this June 25, 2012, photo, the Supreme Court in Washington. Corporations and labor unions have been emboldened this election season to spend unlimited sums of cash. The Supreme Court is telling them to go full-spe... In this June 25, 2012, photo, the Supreme Court in Washington. Corporations and labor unions have been emboldened this election season to spend unlimited sums of cash. The Supreme Court is telling them to go full-speed ahead. The high court reaffirmed its controversial Citizens United decision from 2010, following a challenge to a Montana law that prohibited corporate spending in elections. But the decision issued Monday will likely mean a push for more campaign-finance deregulation. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration will ask the Supreme Court to weigh in on the president’s plan to shield as many as 5 million immigrants living in the country illegally from deportation.

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday upheld a Texas-based federal judge’s injunction blocking President Barack Obama’s plan to protect parents of U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents along with more immigrants who came to the country as children.

The Justice Department says it disagrees with the 2-1 ruling and will appeal to the high court.

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for hoppy hoppy says:

    The Supreme Court will, of course, rule on this sometime around January 2017. So, following that ruling, Obama will then be able to again use his Executive Orders when Congress refuses to do its job. What can go wrong with that?

  2. I’m not sure if I’m reading your comment as you may intend it be read, but FWIW I agree that the SCOTUS will grant cert on the president’s request, not least because that’s always been what happens; that the hearing will be slotted into the first available opening from February 1, 2017 on, and that since Congress neglected to fund what the majority in the 2:1 decision opines to be the state of the law’ in issue here, no one’s going to be able to force Obama to enforce that view on ‘the law’ over the one the Office of Legal Council has come up with and he adopts.

    Lemme put my swami hat on: the Great Avattoirini will now place the envelope against the bejeweled scarab over the pin holding my turban in place … I’m getting … a clear signal … that says … "R U fracking kidding me, Jerry Ed? PREZNIT POWER WINS!’

    Since WWII broke out at least, the executive has always won cases like this. Because there’s no way a majority of SCOTUS will strip this power from the executive. I say, 6:3 with all the libs plus Alito and Thomas siding with the libs on this one, because each of the chief justice, Kennedy & Scalia need to get some credit for throwing a circus bone to the masses of the Base.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for hoppy Avatar for avattoir

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: