IN Guv Signs Law Banning Women From Getting Abortions Because Of Fetal Defects

Indiana Gov. Mike Pence speaks question during a news conference, Tuesday, March 31, 2015, in Indianapolis. Pence said that he wants legislation on his desk by the end of the week to clarify that the state's new reli... Indiana Gov. Mike Pence speaks question during a news conference, Tuesday, March 31, 2015, in Indianapolis. Pence said that he wants legislation on his desk by the end of the week to clarify that the state's new religious-freedom law does not allow discrimination against gays and lesbians. (AP Photo/Darron Cummings) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — Republican Gov. Mike Pence has signed a bill making Indiana the second state to ban abortions because of fetal genetic abnormalities such as Down syndrome.

Pence signed the measure just hours ahead of his deadline to take action on the proposal approved by the Republican-dominated Legislature two weeks ago, the governor’s office said. It takes effect in July.

Pence called the bill “a comprehensive pro-life measure that affirms the value of all human life.”

“I believe that a society can be judged by how it deals with its most vulnerable — the aged, the infirm, the disabled and the unborn,” he said in a statement.

In addition to banning abortions due to fetal genetic abnormalities, the law will prohibit abortions done because of a fetus’s race, sex or ancestry and mandate that the only way to dispose of an aborted fetus is through burial or cremation.

The bill has been criticized by a national group of gynecologists and several female Republican members of the GOP-dominated Indiana Legislature, who say it goes too far in telling women what they can and can’t do.

Pence was a prominent abortion rights opponent while serving in Congress before being elected governor in 2012. He is facing a tough re-election campaign and will be counting on a strong turnout from his evangelical base in November.

It is unclear what impact, if any, the restrictions will actually have on abortions, as women could cite other reasons — or not give any — for seeking an abortion. Under the measure, doctors who perform forbidden abortions could be sued for wrongful death or face discipline from the state medical licensing board. Women receiving such abortions wouldn’t face punishment.

Critics say the measure would require pregnant women to endure complicated pregnancies that pose a danger to their health and would lead women to not speak candidly with their doctors.

North Dakota adopted similar restrictions under a 2013 law approved by that state’s Republican-led Legislature.

Critics in Indiana question whether the measure is constitutional, and even GOP House Speaker Brian Bosma said he expects a court challenge if Pence signs the bill into law. The New York-based Center for Reproductive Rights backed a lawsuit challenging the North Dakota law, but it went unresolved because the Fargo clinic decided instead to focus its fight on another abortion ban.

___

Associated Press writer Tom Davies contributed to this report.

Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. They will never consider a “hands off” approach …

    as long as it has to do with a woman’s vagina —

  2. I suppose that they will now be criminalizing amniocentesis and travel out of state for pregnant women. No one in IN is more than 3 hours from IL. You can get an abortion there. It’s just more inconvenient. We had the amnio, and since my wife was older (39), we certainly would have aborted if Down’s or other birth defect was present. This is the “forced birther” bill at its most clear.

  3. Is stupidity common in this part of the country. Ignorant a$$hole.

  4. who knew that the majority of Indiana’s Republican legislature had so many qualified OB/GYN members?

  5. Critics in Indiana question whether the measure is constitutional, and
    even GOP House Speaker Brian Bosma said he expects a court challenge if
    Pence signs the bill into law.

    How many billions have GOPers wasted on 4 decades of unconstitutional laws?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

50 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for ajm Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for nickdanger Avatar for foundryman Avatar for bojimbo26 Avatar for commiedearest Avatar for wwss Avatar for irasdad Avatar for zoester Avatar for sandyh Avatar for hychka Avatar for rev Avatar for radgal70 Avatar for maxaroo Avatar for jcblues Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for azjude Avatar for darrtown Avatar for 62fender Avatar for ljb860 Avatar for landshark2897

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: