Los Angeles Looks Into Giving Cash Prizes To People Who Vote

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Los Angeles is considering turning voting ballots into lottery tickets.

With fewer than a fourth of voters showing up for recent local elections, the city’s Ethics Commission voted to recommend that the City Council consider a cash-prize drawing as an incentive to vote.

Commission President Nathan Hochman said a pilot program should be used first to find out the number and size of prizes that would bump up turnout.

“Maybe it’s $25,000 maybe it’s $50,000,” Hochman said, according to the Los Angeles Times (http://lat.ms/1uV1Ekw ). “That’s where the pilot program comes in.”

The Thursday vote was unanimous. The issue now moves to the Rules, Elections and Intergovernmental Relations Committee headed by City Council President Herb Wesson, who said he’s intrigued by the idea but wants to hear what neighborhood councils and “legal beagles” think.

“I can’t wait to have this conversation,” he said, but added that he didn’t want to be the “poster child” for the proposal.

It wasn’t immediately clear whether there was any precedent in other cities or states for such a move, which brings with it questions of propriety and legality.

Federal law prohibits payment for voting, but Ethics Commissioner Jessica Levinson, who is also an attorney and law school professor, says that statute wouldn’t apply to elections without federal races on the ballot.

California law prohibits money or gifts for votes for a particular candidate or measure, or payment to stay away from the polls altogether.

Hochman said the proposed prizes would be for simply entering the voting booth.

“If they truly think there are no good candidates,” he said, “we’re not going to force them.”

The idea may require a ballot measure for approval, depending on the source of the funding.

Other ideas for turning up turnout — including changing municipal elections to even-numbered years to sync with federal elections — could prove longer and more laborious, making faster, blunter approaches more desirable.

“We have turnout in citywide elections in the high teens and low 20s and I think that’s pretty dismal,” Levinson said.

___

Information from: Los Angeles Times, http://www.latimes.com

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News
8
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for gr gr says:

    What’s to keep a voter from voting randomly for candidates just to get a prize entry?

    Maybe it could be tried on an experimental basis.

  2. Avatar for chammy chammy says:

    So why the picture of voters in Ventura County which is not Los Angeles

  3. Avatar for fitley fitley says:

    This could work as long as Republicans aren’t in charge of the lottery numbers.

  4. What is the advantage to society of having people vote who have no interest in the election?

  5. Well hell, if elected officials, say CongressWhores in particular can turn their voting responsibilities into personal gold, why shouldn’t voters get their cut?

    Our form of government has been steadily corrupted and pimped out since 1980. And nobody wants to stop the misuse and abuse. There are nests to be feathered here!

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

2 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for peter_schwartz Avatar for mooster Avatar for chammy Avatar for trippin Avatar for harposnarx Avatar for gr Avatar for fitley

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: