UPDATE: Aug. 18, 2015, 3:52 PM EDT
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (AP) — A New Mexico judge ruled Tuesday that two New Mexico police officers must stand trial on murder charges in the fatal, on-duty shooting of a homeless man that sparked angry protests in Albuquerque and helped lead police to overhaul use of force policies.
Pro Tem Judge Neil Candelaria said after a nearly two-week preliminary hearing that there was probable cause for the murder case against Officer Dominique Perez and former Detective Keith Sandy to go to trial.
Prosecutors filed murder charges against the two officers in the killing of 38-year-old James Boyd, who authorities say had schizophrenia. He was shot during an hours-long standoff in the foothills of the Sandia Mountains, where police accused him of camping illegally. He died at a hospital after his arm was amputated.
Seven police officers around the country have faced murder charges for on-duty incidents since 2010. One was convicted of manslaughter and assault after a second-degree murder count was dropped. The rest are still in court proceedings.
In the New Mexico ruling, the judge threw out an involuntary manslaughter option.
Asked by defense lawyer Sam Bregman what standard he used to justify probable cause, the judge said “what a reasonable police officer in that situation would do.”
Special Prosecutor Randi McGinn said during the hearing that Perez and Sandy came to the scene with the intent of attacking Boyd during a “paramilitary response.”
“They created the danger. It was not Mr. Boyd who came at them,” McGinn told the judge.
Defense lawyers countered that Boyd had threatened officers with two knives and Perez and Sandy had no choice about opening fire.
During the hearing, Bregman, who represents Sandy, questioned K-9 officer Scott Weimerskirch from a 4-foot platform to illustrate whether Boyd being on higher ground was a threat to officers. Weimerskirch was at the scene when Boyd was shot.
Holding fake knives, Bregman asked if Boyd’s position and his actions put officers in danger. Weimerskirch answered yes.
“I was in a helpless position … trying to control my dog,” Weimerskirch said, crediting Sandy and Perez for saving his life.
Weimerskirch also testified that when he approached Boyd, he ducked because he knew Sandy and Perez would fire at the camper.
Sgt. James Fox said officers who arrived at the scene knew basic information about Boyd when they received reports about him camping illegally. But it was unclear from the testimony if Perez and Sandy also knew the details of Boyd’s mental illness.
Video of the shooting showed Boyd appearing to surrender before he was shot.
The footage drew national attention to the Albuquerque Police Department, which was being investigated at the time by the U.S. Justice Department over officers’ use of force.
The department was under scrutiny for more than 40 police shootings since 2010.
Shortly after the killing of Boyd last year, Justice Department officials released a harsh report faulting Albuquerque police for excessive force, especially against suspects suffering from mental illness.
The city and the Justice Department later entered an agreement to overhaul policies involving use of force and to appoint a federal monitor to oversee reforms.
Police critics and authorities had been closely watching the preliminary hearing because it’s the only time Albuquerque police officers have faced charges in any of the shootings since 2010.
___
Follow Russell Contreras at http://twitter.com/russcontreras
Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
If memory serves nearly all of the cops who have been charged were caught on video. This case is no exception.
So let me get this straight:
A heavily armed policeman- wearing Kevlar and restraining a 110 lbs. trained attack animal- stands up in front a judge and grand jury, and claims he was “helpless” against the ‘possible’ attack of a schizophrenic man several yards away. Which then required a hail of bullets to subdue the unarmed man who had not attacked them in the previous four hours of the standoff.
Do I have this right?
I guess then we have finally answered the question of 'what is the legal definition of a candy-ass’. Take this boy’s toys away, he doesn’t know what to do with them.
Excellent…This should sweep the Nation…but ALBBQ is a hotbed of racists and crazies , so the jury poll will be an issue…
Just can’t seem to shake the suspicion that there’s some sort of contest or competition, or coordinated something, among certain elements of law enforcement, to "“put a notch on their gun” before the public finally wakes up and starts demanding law enforcement be held to a higher standard than the general public,instead of a lower one.
How many in this current crop of steroid-fueled, prejudice-laden cops have agreed quietly int their squad cars and K9 wagons to help each other get “their kill”?
Call me paranoid, but there is something at work here that descends to depths that can only be labeled “evil”, in the most fundamental definition.
Maybe it is “just” a common, primal spiritual influence, and not any sort of spoken creed, but it just seems to me there’s been way too many of these kinds of unnecessary shootings, it is as if the killers in uniform are compelled to kill someone they deem worthless to their version of society as part of a rite of passage.
If they got a bonus for live capture, but lost some pay every time they shoot someone, regardless of the outcome, they might reconsider bloodshed… sounds terrible, I know, but sometimes incentives like money can change intentions at the most fundamental moments.
Too bad the people we are talking about are that cheap about life itself, but you work with the tools you are given…