RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — A flamboyant former Virginia lawmaker who was jailed in a sex scandal involving a 17-year-old girl is the current front-runner in the crowded race for Richmond mayor, a new poll shows.
The poll from Christopher Newport University says Joseph Morrissey has support from 28 percent of the city’s voters, putting him far ahead of seven other candidates.
Morrissey holds a large advantage in three of the city’s nine precincts. He must win a majority in five of them to avoid a runoff election.
CNU professor Quentin Kidd said the real contest looks to be for second place behind Morrissey if he fails to win the election outright, setting up a runoff election.
Other candidates include Jack Berry, who runs an economic development organization, and Levar Stoney, the former Virginia secretary of the commonwealth who has close ties to Gov. Terry McAuliffe.
Morrissey has long been one of the most colorful politicians in Virginia. Last year he spent his days at the General Assembly last year and his nights in jail after he entered an Alford plea to a misdemeanor for contributing to the delinquency of a minor. In an Alford plea, a defendant acknowledges there is sufficient evidence for a conviction but doesn’t admit guilt.
Morrissey later married the woman, and they have two children.
Morrissey, who is white, has positioned himself as a champion of Richmond’s lower-income population, which is largely black. A former boxer, Morrissey has long cultivated a “fighting Joe” image as a lawyer in a career marked by fistfights, contempt of court citations and the loss and reinstatement of his law license.
The poll of 600 Richmond registered voters was conducted Aug. 18-24 by the Wason Center for Public Policy at CNU and has a margin of error of 4.9 percent.
Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Maybe Weiner does have a chance at a come back.
So sexual activity makes young women “delinquent”, does it? This country has a long way left to go to overcome its puritanical underpinnings…
Probably not plain vanilla teenage sexual activity, but sexual activity with an older man?
In any case, he denied any sexual activity with her even with his having sent nude photos of the girl to a third party. Somehow this sleaze ball got the child porn charges and so on dropped to the point that she looks like the guilty party in his plea. He’s got multiple illegitimate kids which he lied to her about, and she married him anyway…
The good news is that he’s an ex-Democrat. But Richmond, WTF.
I had relationships with adult men when I was 16 and 17 (and if you had to spend time around the boys at my high school, it’d be easy to see why). I like to think I turned out okay.
The idea that the same laws that cover real horrors like shooting video of small children being raped also apply to women years past puberty willingly sending photos of themselves to their lovers is really twisted. (Though in this case, yeah, the fact that the guy sent the photos to a third party - I have no problem with THAT being criminal. But it’s not what I would call “child porn” - rather a creepy violation of trust and privacy.)