GOP Idaho Gov Vetoes ‘Unconstitutional’ Bill To Teach Bible In Public Schools

Idaho Gov. C.L. "Butch" Otter takes questions from reporters after issuing a proclamation ordering a special session of the Idaho legislature in his office at the state Capitol building on Wednesday, Apr. 29, 2015 in... Idaho Gov. C.L. "Butch" Otter takes questions from reporters after issuing a proclamation ordering a special session of the Idaho legislature in his office at the state Capitol building on Wednesday, Apr. 29, 2015 in Boise, Idaho. (AP Photo/Otto Kitsinger) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

BOISE, Idaho (AP) — Idaho Gov. C. L. “Butch” Otter vetoed legislation Tuesday that would have expressly permitted the use of the Bible in public school instruction, calling the measure unconstitutional.

“I have deep respect and appreciation for the Bible as religious doctrine as well as a piece of historic literature,” Otter wrote in a letter accompanying the veto. “However, allowing S1342 to become law is a direct contravention to the Idaho Constitution and it could result for the loss of funding and costly litigation for Idaho public schools.”

Otter’s decision was his first veto of 2016. He has until Friday to take action on remaining bills.

Idaho public school students are already allowed to reference the Bible and other religious texts in their studies, but the rejected legislation specifically mentions the Bible, stating the book could be used for reference purposes in subjects such as literature, history, music and world geography.

State lawmakers passed the measure in the final week of this year’s session, after ignoring a warning from the attorney general’s office that questioned its legality. A statement released by the office quoted the Idaho Constitution that prohibits the use of books that are of a sectarian or denomination character in public schools.

Conservative lawmakers said the measure would withstand litigation and was needed because the holy book was “under attack.” The measure’s opponents said mentioning the Bible would give JudeoChristian values preference over other religions.

The bill’s sponsor, Sen. Sheryl Nuxoll, R-Cottonwood, said she was disappointed by Otter’s decision and pointed out that the measure passed with overwhelming support in the Legislature.

“People with last names like Washington, Adams, and Madison blatantly identified the Bible as that reference point. They feared not having it would result in corruption and misuse of taxpayer funds. Are they right?” she said in a prepared statement.

The Legislature also wrestled with other religious-themed legislation, including one measure designed to keep Shariah law out of government agencies and court cases. To date, there have been no court rulings in Idaho based on Shariah law. The contentious legislation died after being sent to the House floor for amendments.

Otter’s veto came on the heels of a recent move by Tennessee lawmakers to make the Holy Bible the official state book, despite the attorney general’s argument that the legislation is illegal.

Tennessee Gov. Bill Haslam said he opposes the measure but hasn’t said whether he would veto the legislation.

Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Periodically, there is a sane Republican that actually READS the Constitution…even in Idaho.

  2. Props to the Gov., even though the party is a complete mess, there are still a few at least one Republican who is willing to do the right thing for now.

  3. Avatar for paulw paulw says:

    How low have we set the bar that this is praiseworthy.

    “could be used for reference purposes in subjects such as literature, history, music and world geography.”

    No. Just no. (Well, maybe literature if you’re using the KJV and you want to talk about the theories that some famous authors of the time were responsible for parts of it, or to look at how it’s affected wirting in english since then. But that’s not a course that the legislature needs to micromanage.)

  4. yeah. but what about the clueless legislators that passed the bill? know-nothings.

  5. The appeal to the Founders is just showing a glimpse of historical revisionism. Many of the founders were reported as Christian, that does not mean it had much say in founding the Constitution. Not all governments founded by Christians look like the US, really the US was somewhat unique in the period, though not totally.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

48 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for ajaykalra Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for lochsabill Avatar for meri Avatar for sysprog Avatar for tflick Avatar for chammy Avatar for ryanp Avatar for borisjimbo Avatar for notborneveryminute Avatar for ottnott Avatar for jeffrey Avatar for kitty Avatar for dickweed Avatar for bd2999 Avatar for jaybeeraybee Avatar for zuch Avatar for dodgson Avatar for edhedh Avatar for uneducated Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for ncgirl741

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: