Hawaii Judge Blocks New Trump Travel Ban Hours Before Set To Take Effect

FILE - This Dec. 2015 file photo shows U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson in Honolulu. Watson on Thursday, July 13, 2017, expanded the list of family relationships needed by people seeking new visas from six mostly M... FILE - This Dec. 2015 file photo shows U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson in Honolulu. Watson on Thursday, July 13, 2017, expanded the list of family relationships needed by people seeking new visas from six mostly Muslim countries to avoid President Donald Trump's travel ban. Watson ordered the government not to enforce the ban on grandparents, grandchildren, brothers-in-law, sisters-in-law, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews and cousins of people in the United States. (George Lee /The Star-Advertiser via AP, File) MORE LESS

HONOLULU (AP) — A federal judge in Hawaii blocked the Trump administration Tuesday from enforcing its latest travel ban, just hours before it was set to take effect.

U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson granted Hawaii’s request to temporarily block the policy that was to be implemented starting early Wednesday. He found Trump’s executive order “suffers from precisely the same maladies as its predecessor.”

The judge, appointed by former President Barack Obama, said the new restrictions ignore a federal appeals court ruling that found President Donald Trump’s previous ban exceeds the scope of his authority. The latest version “plainly discriminates based on nationality in the manner that the 9th Circuit has found antithetical to … the founding principles of this nation,” Watson wrote.

The Trump administration in September announced the restrictions affecting citizens of Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Syria, and Yemen — and some Venezuelan government officials and their families.

The government has said the new policy was based on an objective assessment of each country’s security situation and willingness to share information with the U.S.

Hawaii argued in court documents that the updated ban is a continuation of Trump’s “promise to exclude Muslims from the United States” despite the addition of two non-majority Muslim countries.

Other courts are weighing challenges to the latest travel restrictions.

In Maryland, the American Civil Liberties Union and other groups are seeking to block the visa and entry restrictions in the president’s latest proclamation.

Washington state, Massachusetts, California, Oregon, New York and Maryland have challenged the policy before U.S. District Judge James Robart in Seattle, who struck down Trump’s initial ban in January.

That policy led to chaos and confusion at airports nationwide and triggered several lawsuits, including one from Hawaii.

When Trump revised the ban, state Attorney General Doug Chin changed the lawsuit to challenge that version. In March, Watson agreed with Hawaii that it amounted to discrimination based on nationality and religion.

A subsequent U.S. Supreme Court ruling allowed the administration to partially reinstate that 90-day ban on visitors from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen and a 120-day ban on all refugees.

But it said the policy didn’t apply to refugees and travelers with a “bona fide relationship” with a person or entity in the U.S.

Hawaii then successfully challenged the federal government’s definition of which family members would be allowed into the country. Watson ordered the government not to enforce the ban on close relatives such as grandparents, grandchildren, uncles and aunts.

The judge’s order Tuesday prevents acting Homeland Security Secretary Elaine Duke and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson from implementing the latest travel ban.

Watson said he would set an expedited hearing to determine whether the temporary restraining order should be extended.

5
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. As if the rest of America (other than racist deplorables) needs yet another reason to love and treasure Hawaii, and our brothers and sisters living there!

  2. And we go live now to the rose garden for donnie’s response to this development:

    I can’t believe some judge out on an island blocked my law again. This law is very, very, very important to the safety of my voters, so we’re going to do something about it ve… hey, did you know that this judge is on an island? And that the island is surrounded by water? And that the water is an actual ocean, which means it’s very, very big, and very, very far from land, beleive me.

    So you can’t just drive to this island… which makes me wonder how the judge got there in the first place. And also, since this island just got totally devastated by a hurricane - you should have seen it, it was the most devastating every, really, just really, really, incredible, unbelievable destruction, and we’re going to be looking at that some more, but their death toll was very low… anyway, the island just got devastated, so how is the judge even still there? And the island is in such tremendous, beautiful debt, I don’t know how they can afford the judge in the first place. We need to look at that, to make sure the debt gets paid off before they go and pay judges, believe me.

    What’s that? Oh, of course I knew it was a different island, I never said it was the same island. Other people just told me it was the same island. You’ll have to ask my generals about this, they’ll tell you that it was Obama who thought it was the same island.

  3. Avatar for marby marby says:

    It does the soul good to know that there are still public officials out there who are willing to stand up for what is right, what is constitutional, what is American. (and also points to the importance of who fills judicial appointments).

  4. Blocked, rejected, flyswatted, repelled, backhanded, quashed, denied, laughed out of the courtroom. Yeah, these are all descriptions of how Trounce’s preposterous attempt to target Muslims have been ‘banned’.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for marby Avatar for leftflank Avatar for bentonf Avatar for loss_mentality

Continue Discussion