AP: GOP Leaders Have Plan B If SCOTUS Voids Obamacare Subsidies

House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio speaks to reporters following a meeting on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2015. Boehner said he's waiting for the Senate to act on legislation to fund the Homeland ... House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio speaks to reporters following a meeting on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2015. Boehner said he's waiting for the Senate to act on legislation to fund the Homeland Security Department ahead of Friday's midnight deadline. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh) MORE LESS

WASHINGTON (AP) — House and Senate Republican leaders are ready to tell GOP lawmakers about their proposals for responding to a Supreme Court decision that could abruptly halt federal health care subsidies for millions of people.

With justices expected to rule imminently and possibly obliterate a pillar of President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul, each chamber’s Republican leaders planned separate briefings Wednesday for their party’s rank-and-file.

Some Republican aides said Tuesday that House and Senate leaders were working toward an agreement to temporarily continue some aid to Americans now receiving the subsidies and curb some requirements of the 2010 law. Others said the two chambers’ leaders had no final plans and said the sessions were designed to give GOP lawmakers status reports and get feedback.

GOP lawmakers want to “protect the people” hurt if the subsidies end, “not protect the law,” Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., a leader of his party’s efforts to fashion a response, said recently.

The Supreme Court is expected to rule this month on a lawsuit brought by conservatives and backed by the GOP. They say that under the 2010 law, the aid is limited to states operating their own insurance marketplaces, and is not allowed for the roughly three-dozen that use the federal HealthCare.gov website.

Democrats say the overall bill’s context makes clear that the subsidies were designed to go to residents of every state.

In the 34 states likeliest to be hit hardest should the justices erase those subsidies, about 6.4 million people receive the aid, averaging $272 monthly, according to the Health and Human Services Department. Analysts have warned that most of those people would no longer be able to afford health coverage if the assistance was ended.

Many GOP leaders want to temporarily continue some form of aid but also pare back Obama’s law, including ending its requirements that most people buy coverage and most companies provide it to workers. They would also give states more power to decide what types of coverage insurers must provide.

The health law’s subsidies are currently paid to recipients as tax credits. Two aides said under the House GOP’s plans, states next year would be given federal block grants for aid programs they could establish, in amounts comparable to the tax credits people in each state would have received.

Such legislation would all but certainly draw solid Democratic opposition and a veto from the president, should the GOP garner enough votes to send it to him. Republicans have so far been divided over what their response to the law suit should be, including some conservatives who say the statute’s subsidies should be completely ended and the law dismantled.

“I’m not sure how I go back and tell people that I ran trying to undo Obamacare, and that the first real chance I get, I vote to extend one of the most heinous parts of the law,” said conservative Rep. Mick Mulvaney, R-S.C.

Many Republicans say since Obama would not let them kill his law, a complete overhaul will have to await the 2016 elections, when the GOP hopes to capture the White House and retain congressional control.

Donald Stewart, spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said GOP leaders have been working toward “a responsible approach to protect families” from the health care law. He said the meeting with Republican senators would be “the latest in a series of briefings with our members.”

Several other Republican aides spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the plans publicly.

___

AP Special Correspondent David Espo contributed to this report.

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

62
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for jw1 jw1 says:

    #You lie!

    jw1

  2. “under the House GOP’s plans, states next year would be given federal block grants for aid programs they could establish”

    Teatroll Rosetta Stone: “We want to give GOP state legislatures and administrations more slush-fund money to balance their budgets after giving the wealthy more tax cuts.”

    1. Vote to repeal Obamacare. Have Obama veto that one.
    2. Vote to reinstate subsidies, but with several poison pills to destroy Obamacare. Get another veto.
    3. Do nothing else.
    4. Blame Obama for next 10 years.

    Am I missing anything?

  3. Avatar for jinnj jinnj says:

    Plain & simple

    • If SCOTUS goes against Obamacare - GOP will scramble for a weak patch to avoid election damage.
    • If SCOTUS preserves Obamacare - GOP will redouble efforts to destroy it via any means available.
  4. How do they “help the people” without “helping the law”? Wouldn’t helping the people entail restoring subsidies?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

56 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for jw1 Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for gelfling545 Avatar for targetpractice Avatar for jloomis3 Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for trippin Avatar for easydm Avatar for commiedearest Avatar for thunderhawk Avatar for rudesan Avatar for randyabraham Avatar for bluinmaine Avatar for mcbain Avatar for sniffit Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for jjrothery Avatar for docb Avatar for ottnott Avatar for benthere Avatar for jinnj Avatar for johniwaniszek

Continue Discussion