House GOPers’ Benghazi Report Faults Security; No New Clinton Allegations

FILE - In this Jan. 6, 2016 file photo, House Benghazi Committee Chairman Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C. speaks to reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington. It’s a question congressional investigators have long been seekin... FILE - In this Jan. 6, 2016 file photo, House Benghazi Committee Chairman Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C. speaks to reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington. It’s a question congressional investigators have long been seeking to answer: Could the military have reached the besieged diplomatic outpost in Benghazi, Libya, in time to prevent the killings of four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, the night of Sept. 11, 2012? Gowdy, echoing comments by his top lawyer, now says no. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — Republicans on the House Benghazi Committee harshly faulted the Obama administration Tuesday for lax security and a slow response to the deadly 2012 attacks at the U.S. diplomatic outpost in Libya. But they produced no new allegations about then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

The attacks, which killed four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, have been repeatedly cited by Republicans as a serious failure by the administration and by Clinton, who now is the presumptive Democratic nominee for president.

But the committee’s 800-page report, released by Republican members, offered no “smoking gun” about Clinton’s role. Panel chairman Trey Gowdy has said the report was not aimed at her, though Democrats have accused the committee’s Republican majority of targeting her throughout.

The report from the two-year, $7 million investigation does include severe criticism of the military, CIA and administration officials for their response as the attacks unfolded the night of Sept. 11, 2012, and their subsequent explanation to the American people.

In the aftermath, “you didn’t know that a single U.S. military asset did not meet a single designated timeline,” Rep. Gowdy, R-S.C., told reporters. “Think about that for a second.”

“Nothing was en route to Libya at the time the last two Americans were killed almost eight hours after the attacks began,” Gowdy said at a news conference. The report documents that the U.S. was slow to send help to the Americans “because of an obsession with hurting the Libyans’ feelings,” he said. The report also portrays a “series of heroic acts” by Americans under attack.”

Military leaders have testified repeatedly that they didn’t have intelligence information on what was happening or the resources on alert to respond in time to the two attacks, hours apart.

The Libya attacks became immediate political fodder, given their timing in the weeks before Obama’s re-election, and that has not abated despite seven previous investigations. There has been finger-pointing on both sides over security at the U.S. diplomatic outpost in Benghazi and whether the White House initially tried to portray the assault as a protest over an offensive, anti-Muslim video, instead of a calculated terrorist attack.

The GOP report offers no major revelations, but that won’t quiet the criticism of Clinton from conservatives, likely Republican rival Donald Trump and other detractors.

Republican insistence that the investigation was not politically motivated was undermined last year when House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., suggested that the House committee could take credit for Clinton’s then-slumping poll numbers.

In response to the report, Clinton’s campaign said it had “not found anything to contradict the conclusions of the multiple, earlier investigations.”

Committee Democrats released their own report Monday saying that while the State Department’s security measures in Benghazi the night of Sept. 11, 2012, were “woefully inadequate,” Clinton never personally turned down a request for additional security. Democrats said the military could not have done anything differently that night to save the lives of the Americans.

On Tuesday, the panel’s Democrats denounced the Republicans’ report as “a conspiracy theory on steroids — bringing back long-debunked allegations with no credible evidence whatsoever.” The statement added: “Republicans promised a process and report that was fair and bipartisan, but this is exactly the opposite.”

The State Department also issued a statement Tuesday, saying that the “essential facts” of the attacks “have been known for some time,” and have been the subject of numerous reviews, including one by an independent review board.

Spokesman Mark Toner said the department had implemented most of the recommendations of the independent review board and was continuing to expand security at its facilities and improve its threat assessment.

“We have made great progress toward making our posts safer since 2012,” Toner said in a statement. “Our priority continues to be carrying out our national security mission while mitigating the risks to our employees.”

Toner said the department cooperated extensively with the House panel, providing more than 50 current and former employees for interviews and over 100,000 pages of documents.

Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, who helped write the Republican report, told CNN that “too little effort was made to protect” Stevens and the others. “We didn’t move heaven and earth to get help to the people who were fighting for their lives,” he said.

Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. So who’s surprised?

  2. Not with a bang, but with a whimper.

  3. Anyone find Trey Gowdy’s mistress yet?

  4. Avatar for hjs62 hjs62 says:

    "Democrats say the panel’s primary goal is to undermine Hillary Clinton’s presidential bid."

    Actually, it was Republican Kevin McCarthy that said that

  5. This. I kind of figure there’d be more fanfare…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

83 more replies

Participants

Avatar for sedonaz Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for yeahwhatever Avatar for imkmu3 Avatar for chammy Avatar for rudesan Avatar for thx1138 Avatar for voreason Avatar for thepsyker Avatar for mantan Avatar for sniffit Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for sherlock1 Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for breakingdeadmen Avatar for ottnott Avatar for ignoreland Avatar for dnl Avatar for benthere Avatar for reggid Avatar for misterneutron Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for deltoid

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: