GAO: Pentagon Broke The Law In Bergdahl Swap

This undated image provided by the U.S. Army shows Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl. The nearly five-year effort to free the only American soldier held captive in Afghanistan is scattered among numerous federal agencies with a loo... This undated image provided by the U.S. Army shows Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl. The nearly five-year effort to free the only American soldier held captive in Afghanistan is scattered among numerous federal agencies with a loosely organized group of people working on it mostly part time, according to two members of Congress and military officials involved in the effort. An ever-shrinking U.S. military presence in Afghanistan has re-focused attention on efforts to bring home Bergdahl, who has been held by the Taliban since June 30, 2009. (AP Photo/U.S. Army) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Pentagon broke the law when it swapped Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, a prisoner in Afghanistan for five years, for five Taliban leaders, congressional investigators said Thursday.

The nonpartisan Government Accountability Office said the Defense Department failed to notify the relevant congressional committees at least 30 days in advance of the exchange — a clear violation of the law — and used $988,400 of a wartime account to make the transfer. The GAO also said the Pentagon’s use of funds that hadn’t been expressly appropriated violated the Antideficiency Act.

“In our view, the meaning of the (law) is clear and unambiguous,” the GAO wrote to nine Republican senators, including Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and various committees. “Section 8111 prohibits the use of ‘funds appropriated or otherwise made available’ in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014, to transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo Bay to the custody or control of a foreign entity’ except in accordance” with the law.

The GAO said the relevant committees received phone calls from May 31 — the day of the transfer — to June 1, with written notification coming on June 2.

Five senior Taliban were released from the U.S. prison at Guantanamo in exchange for Bergdahl, who had disappeared from his post in Paktika province in eastern Afghanistan on June 30, 2009. The five Taliban are to remain in Qatar for a year.

Spokesman Rear Adm. John Kirby defended the Pentagon’s actions, saying that as Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel stated in his congressional testimony earlier this year, the Defense Department “acted lawfully in the operation to recover Sgt. Bergdahl, a judgment that was supported by the Justice Department.”

“The administration had a fleeting opportunity to protect the life of a U.S. service member held captive and in danger for almost five years,” Kirby added. “Under these exceptional circumstances, the administration determined that it was necessary and appropriate to forgo 30 days’ notice of the transfer in order to obtain Sgt. Bergdahl’s safe return.”

Lawmakers, especially Republicans, were angry with President Barack Obama and members of the administration for failing to notify them about the swap. Some in Congress have said Bergdahl was a deserter and the United States gave up too much for his freedom. Several lawmakers have cited intelligence suggesting the high-level Taliban officials could return to the Afghanistan battlefield.

The administration has defended the swap and its decision to keep Congress in the dark, saying concern about Bergdahl’s health and safety required speedy action.

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, a member of the Intelligence Committee, said it was “completely disingenuous” for the administration to suggest that notifying Congress might have compromised the transfer because dozens of administration officials knew well in advance.

“It’s not hard to imagine that the president didn’t notify us until after the fact because he knew the proposed transfer would have been met with opposition,” Collins said in a statement Thursday. “The president’s decision is part of a disturbing pattern where he unilaterally decides that he does not have to comply with provisions of laws with which he disagrees.”

The Joint Chiefs of Staff has unanimously supported the exchange, insisting that the United States has a sacred commitment to men and women who serve that it will never leave anyone behind on the battlefield. Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, said the swap in May was “likely our last, best opportunity” to free Bergdahl.

Bergdahl is doing administrative duties at Fort Sam Houston in San Antonio while an investigation into how he was captured by the Taliban is conducted.

Last month, a bitterly divided House Armed Services Committee voted to condemn Obama for the swap. The Republican-led panel backed a nonbinding resolution that disapproves of the exchange and faults Obama for failing to notify Congress 30 days in advance of the swap, as required by law.

The bipartisan resolution raised national security concerns about the transfer of the five Taliban, who had been held at the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, for more than a decade, and the “repercussions of negotiating with terrorists.” The measure also expresses relief that Bergdahl has returned safely to the United States.

The full House is expected to consider the measure in the fall, just a few weeks before the midterm elections.

___

Associated Press writer Lolita C. Baldor contributed to this report.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News
50
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. A “bitterly divided House Armed Services Committee” drew up a “bipartisan resolution”?

    Huh?

  2. Okay, so who wants to be the guy to file charges for this one?

    Anyone?

    Anyone?

    Bueller?

  3. Hey troops, GOP says Congress sometimes has to give the okay before we can get you out of enemy hands and back home.

    They will stick a yellow ribbon magnet on a filing cabinet while you wait, so rest assured that you will have their full support.

  4. the republicons will say hostages why worry about him … can we make money on it … can we blame obama because of it…and are we tru with the BS benghazi investigation yet???

  5. I’d like to see a press conference where Obama publicly calls out a do-nothing Congress as reason enough to justify this or any other executive action, drop the mic and exit camera right. Then book a full Ginsburg on the following Sunday to talk straight about race, inequality, the difference between the left and right wings and the two Americas that exist today.

    (Or maybe I’ll put the bong down now.)

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

44 more replies

Participants

Avatar for sponson Avatar for abbymac Avatar for daytrader Avatar for Patriott Avatar for deckbose Avatar for keepemhonest Avatar for leftflank Avatar for thunderhawk Avatar for cwazycajun Avatar for tani Avatar for orthostice Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for frankly_my_dear Avatar for midnight_rambler Avatar for richardnixonhuberthumphrey Avatar for captaincommonsense Avatar for hoagie Avatar for smokinthegotp Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for darrtown Avatar for occamsrazor2 Avatar for ltmcdies Avatar for Amanda_Kerri Avatar for 62fender

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: