Dems Urge Trump To Veto Bill Blocking Obama-Era Online Privacy Rule

Senate Minority Leader Sen. Charles Schumer of N.Y., speaks during an interview in his office on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, March 30, 2017. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

NEW YORK (AP) — Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer is urging President Donald Trump to veto a resolution that would kill an online privacy regulation, a move that could allow internet providers to sell information about their customers’ browsing habits.

The New York senator and 46 other Senate Democrats signed a letter calling on Trump to “tell us whose side he’s really on.”

The Federal Communications Commission rule issued in October was designed to give consumers greater control over how internet service providers such as Comcast, AT&T and Verizon share information. But critics said the rule would have stifled innovation and picked winners and losers among internet companies.

Both the House and the Senate voted this week to pass the resolution, sending it to Trump.

“If President Trump clicks his pen and signs this resolution, consumers will be stripped of critical privacy protections in a New York minute,” Schumer said. “Signing this rollback into law would mean private data from our laptops, iPads, and even our cellphones would be fair game for internet companies to sell and make a fast buck.”

The Trump-appointed chairman of the FCC, Ajit Pai, is a critic of the broadband privacy rules and has said he wants to roll them back. He and other Republicans want a different federal agency, the Federal Trade Commission, to police privacy for both broadband companies like AT&T and internet companies like Google, which do not have to ask users’ permission before tracking what websites they visit.

Trump is expected to make his decision soon.

Copyright 2017 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

9
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. The unpresident has too much Luhhhhhve to veto it His corpulent bod is bursting with luhhhhve. His nipples are exploding with delight. He is overcome by the redolence of luhhhve…

    And meanwhile, Adam Schiff, unburdened by luhhhhve:

    Now this is a very interesting point. How does the white house know that these are the same materials that were shown to the chairman if the white house wasn’t aware what the chairman was being shown? And the second point was also made to me, this is, I think, was also underscored by Sean spicer and that is that it was told me by the deputy assistant the materials were produced during the ordinary course of business. The question for the white house and Mr. Spicer is the ordinary course of whose business? Because if these were produced either for or by the white house, then why all of the subterfuge?

  2. Avatar for tao tao says:

    Will 45 save Americans’ privacy when his own account data would write a best seller? Sigh. We’re boned.

  3. ”Private data from our laptops, iPads, and even our cellphones would be fair game for internet companies to sell.”

    …to the Russian mafia.

    (h/t @stephen_maturin)

  4. "OK, listen up. Who do we have on staff that can explain to Donnie what this bill will do? Anyone? Anyone at all?

    Marge please get that IT guy that we purged on the line…"

  5. Adam Schiff, on the mark once again; thanks for the link. (It’s almost good enough to make me forgive you for triggering my gag reflex with that first sentence…)

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

3 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for 1gg Avatar for arrrrrj Avatar for irasdad Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for tao Avatar for twowolves Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for louydepalma

Continue Discussion