Top Senate Intel Dem Savages Twitter For ‘Inadequate’ Presentation To Staff

Senator Mark Warner (D-VA) participates in a hearing to Senate Intelligence Committee on Russia's intelligence activities, at Dirksen Senate Office Buliding in Washington, DC on January 10, 2017. (Photo by Riccardo S... Senator Mark Warner (D-VA) participates in a hearing to Senate Intelligence Committee on Russia's intelligence activities, at Dirksen Senate Office Buliding in Washington, DC on January 10, 2017. (Photo by Riccardo Savi) *** Please Use Credit from Credit Field ***(Sipa via AP Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee bashed Twitter Thursday for an “inadequate” and “deeply disappointing” presentation the social meeting company gave earlier Thursday morning to the committee staff investigating Russian election meddling.

“I am more than a bit surprised, in light of all the public interest in this subject over the last few weeks, that anyone from the Twitter team would think that the presentation they made to the Senate staff today even began to answer the kind of questions that we’d asked,” Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) told reporters.

After meeting with Senate Intel, as well as with the House Intelligence Committee, Twitter posted a statement disclosing that, working from the 450 inauthentic Facebook accounts that Facebook had identified earlier this month, it had found around 200 accounts that violated Twitter’s own rules that have since been suspended.

Warner on Thursday called that work “derivative” and said it showed “an enormous lack of understanding from the Twitter team of how serious this issue is.”

“The effort that appears to be put forward — that it was mostly derivative, based upon the roughly 450 accounts that Facebook identified and then simply searching more about those specific accounts — either shows a unwillingness to take this threat seriously or a complete lack of fulsome effort,” he said.

Warner pointed to recent reports that Russia-linked Twitter accounts may have been behind tweets inflaming both sides of the current NFL national anthem debate.

Asked if he would subpoena Twitter, Warner said, “My goal with all of these entities and enterprises is to continue to try to work on a cooperative basis.”

He argued that the current circumstances in the United States are not the same as the role Twitter plays in oppressive regimes in giving a platform to individuals to be heard.

“If [Americans] don’t know whether ad sponsorship is coming from foreign governments or foreign agents, or if stories are popping up not because there is genuine interest from Americans, but it is being sponsored by foreign entities, I think Americans are going to want to know that and at some point these companies are going to test the confidence and faith that Americans have in their enterprises,” Warner said.

 

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. Sen. Warner is just finding out why a lot of folks won’t buy Twitter stock.
    Management is, well, less than forthcoming.
    They, apparently, have theirs.

  2. It’s amazing that so many “Patriotic” Americans really don’t give a shit about Russian influence in our elections, but then they’ve got theirs (the Orange Bloviator).

  3. Back in the day, when Microsoft still had actual employees, it wasn’t unusual to see people in the halls and in meetings with FYIV* buttons.

    *F#ck You I’m Vested

  4. If [Americans] don’t know whether ad sponsorship is coming from foreign governments or foreign agents, or if stories are popping up not because there is genuine interest from Americans, but it is being sponsored by foreign entities, I think Americans are going to want to know that

    There’s a giant loophole in all of this discussion about the Russian ads.

    As far as I can tell:
    – you don’t need to be a US citizen to form a corporation
    – the corporation formed by non-citizens can be funded by non-US money
    – unlimited amounts of that money can be donated to a non-profit
    – the non-profit is not required to reveal the identity of its donors
    – the non-profit can donate unlimited amounts of its money to super-PACs.

    In other words, there is a legal super-highway for funneling money from foreign interests into political contests. Meanwhile, a candidate will get in trouble if a non-citizen goes to the campaign website and buys a t-shirt.

  5. relax. they’re hemoraging cash. they’ll be out of business soon enough.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

9 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for earlgreyparty Avatar for watergate_mike1 Avatar for mxyztplk Avatar for ottnott Avatar for potomacker Avatar for twowolves Avatar for mtblaze Avatar for diveguy99 Avatar for kafantaris Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for outsidertrading618

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: